Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 'Why Wouldn't You Just Release It?': DNC Chair Confronted Over Buried 2024 Election Autopsy [View all]bottomofthehill
(9,410 posts)6. Sometimes you can't fix stupid.
For everyone screaming Gaza, do you think the people of Gaza would be better, worse or the same under a Harris administration. Now ask yourself do you think we would be fighting a war in Iran with Israel in a Harris administration. There is not always a perfect choice but there is always a best choice. There was a simple best choice but people were too stupid to take it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
23 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
78 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
'Why Wouldn't You Just Release It?': DNC Chair Confronted Over Buried 2024 Election Autopsy [View all]
TheProle
Apr 29
OP
Yep. Being perceived as being in bed with AIPAC is a recipe for disaster.
Queso Delicioso
Apr 29
#16
They are angry with Democrats in general for continuing to support Israel & taking AIPAC money.
CousinIT
Apr 29
#22
In terms of large, powerful PACs who give a substantial amount to Democrats, there are few, if any, worse than AIPAC.
Celerity
Apr 30
#61
Of course those are bad too, but AIPAC (whose RW massive donors often have common agendas with those industries you
Celerity
Apr 30
#65
Not all PACs are bad in terms of intent & impact. I reserve the right to call out the worst ones, which includes AIPAC.
Celerity
Apr 30
#69
Oh, I would love it if ALL PACs and all private money were removed from US politics. Like you said, the concept is bad.
Celerity
Apr 30
#71
Here's the deal. Some broke, flakey candidates are making up lies about their opponents accepting AIPAC money.
LeftInTX
Apr 29
#36
I'm not sure these are the issues the an election autopsy report is designed to confront?
Ilikepurple
Apr 29
#20
I would say that even less people care to silence expression of this issue, but here we are.
Ilikepurple
Apr 29
#56
Because the old guard doesn't want to have to take the heat for loosing.
republianmushroom
Apr 29
#12
What good would it do to have someone who does not support every Democratic nominee?
LeftInTX
Apr 29
#40
Tell that to Mandami. AOC, Rashida Tlaib, Ayanna Pressley, Ilhan Omar....
LiberalLovinLug
Apr 30
#72
So you can't see the relationship of the DNC in promoting candidates into elected officials? That's their job.
LiberalLovinLug
Apr 30
#74
Our new Texas Democratic Party Chair supports rural outreach. He even created a satellite office in Amarillo
LeftInTX
Apr 29
#35
Sadly after today's Supreme Court ruling, voters will just blame Democrats if they don't win more congressional seats.
LeftInTX
Apr 29
#41
The obvious answer is: b/c it blames party leadership (including elected ones) and big donors,
RockRaven
Apr 29
#55
You Know You're Reading An Unbiased Article When You See "Genocidal Attack."
ColoringFool
Apr 30
#66