Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PCB66

(169 posts)
48. Ten years ago we never thought that the SC
Sun May 3, 2026, 10:55 AM
Sunday

would be six Conservatives to three Liberals. But speaking of reality that is why Democrats are calling for more Supreme Court Justices. So that it will be more balanced.

The reality is also that if that happens we could be an election or two away from being exactly where we started from.

Getting more SC Justices may seem like a fix but it could be short lived and come back to bite us in the ass.

The path to getting a proper Supreme Court is really simple. Elect the people that you think will appoint the Justices that have the Judicial record and temperament that reflects your political leanings.

Like Obama said "elections have consequences". He appointed two SC Justices. When Trump got elected he appointed three.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm white, 68 and living on SS orangecrush Apr 29 #1
Seconded here, orangecrush! slightlv Apr 29 #10
Similar situation here orangecrush Apr 29 #13
Me too. Us seniors are lucky that we had it good for many years. kerry-is-my-prez May 1 #23
Sums it up nicely. orangecrush May 1 #26
Sums it up nicely. orangecrush May 1 #27
I'm the same as you -misanthroptimist May 1 #28
The KKKourt "ruling" pissed me off orangecrush May 1 #29
The only white people he truly accommodates are the likes of Musk and Bezos fujiyamasan Saturday #46
And so, Just Jerome Apr 29 #2
Excellent from Wendell Phillips: "Governments exist to protect the rights of minorities..." erronis Apr 29 #3
Fast forwarding to the present time ... oldsoldierfadingfast Apr 29 #6
this one exists to protect itself bigtree Apr 30 #18
Unfortunately a lotta truth there! electric_blue68 May 1 #19
A professor I had for a class in American Law and Racism SidneyR Apr 29 #4
What a wise observation. I wonder if that is widely held amongst the legal academics. erronis Apr 29 #7
Not just white supremacy, rich white supremacy. kerry-is-my-prez May 1 #22
Up next, they will try to make segregation in education, housing, and work legal again. ShazamIam Apr 29 #5
Oh, yes - of course. And then remove that pesky amendment about women's rights. erronis Apr 29 #8
I agree it is likely, they can claim the original documents don't include women and the amendments that recognize women ShazamIam Apr 29 #9
I was pleased to see your reply in the Justice Elena Kagan thread. erronis Apr 29 #11
I am loving that there are 4 women on the U.S. Supreme Court even if one of them is a conservative. ShazamIam Apr 30 #16
Circumvention of Brown v. Board already began misanthrope May 1 #40
Kick dalton99a Apr 29 #12
John Roberts' wet dream mcar Apr 29 #14
Missed the SC ruling that prohibits Civil Rights group suing in regards to VRA sec 2 said discriminations back then... electric_blue68 Apr 29 #15
Supreme Court reform and accountability needed in the next Dem Congress bigtree Apr 30 #17
More twisted than a pretzel! This is really bad sh!t ! electric_blue68 May 1 #20
The problem with that PCB66 May 1 #25
Hmm, welp, you have a point electric_blue68 May 1 #35
Make it a hundred dpibel May 1 #38
The problem is PCB66 May 1 #41
All the more reason to have a massive Supreme Court dpibel May 1 #43
My point is that PCB66 Saturday #45
You'd apparently be surprised by reality dpibel Saturday #47
Ten years ago we never thought that the SC PCB66 Sunday #48
I cannot believe the evil that these people (Republicans) are doing. kerry-is-my-prez May 1 #21
I live in an area with large Hispanic populations Melon May 1 #24
DURec leftstreet May 1 #30
It's one thing to reverse precedent. But it's another thing to strike down established legislation Buckeyeblue May 1 #31
The Constitution is more fragile than most of us realize PCB66 May 1 #39
The MAGAts aren't real crazy about women of any color either. F*ck all of them. Greybnk48 May 1 #32
That's their goal. I don't think they've won yet, in spite of the setbacks. Martin68 May 1 #33
"Colorblind" has a whole new meaning when used by this court. Buddyzbuddy May 1 #34
White male...... Hope22 May 1 #36
The nation is back to accommodating the morbidly wealthy, white, male robber barons. debsy May 1 #37
One of the worst set backs in American history. Passages May 1 #42
Ok to revolt now...? Six117 May 1 #44
That's been a long time goal by much of the right themaguffin Sunday #49
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The nation is back to acc...»Reply #48