Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BlueWaveNeverEnd

(14,843 posts)
Wed May 6, 2026, 04:21 PM Yesterday

California landowners who cut 38 trees in Oakland hills hit with $915,000 fine [View all]

https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/california-landowners-who-cut-38-trees-in-oakland-22245228.php




The fine is perhaps the largest ever in Oakland for destroying trees.

Councilmembers Janani Ramachandran, Noel Gallo, Kevin Jenkins, Zac Unger and Charlene Wang voted for the fine. Rowena Brown, Carroll Fife and Ken Houston voted no.

Emeryville residents Matthew Bernard and Lynn Warner purchased the hillside lot behind the Claremont Hotel and Club in 2019. Two years later, city staff said the couple started felling trees without permits. The trees included native live oaks, broad-leaf maples, buckeyes and other species.

Bernard repeatedly ignored warnings that he needed permits to cut down the trees, city staff said. Some of the trees were on neighboring properties.

The couple applied for building permits to construct a single-family residence, but Oakland issued them a notice of violation of the city’s protected tree ordinance last year. When staff calculated the value of each tree — from a small plum worth $750 to a mature coast live oak valued at $95,000 — the total was nearly $1 million.

City staff say trees provide valuable ecosystem services like preventing fires, holding hillside together against erosion and debris flows, supporting biodiversity, cleaning the air and improving people’s mental health.
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Welcome to r/treelaw! sakabatou Yesterday #1
not to be confused with r/trees. uncle ray 22 hrs ago #9
More: Fife railed against what she said were racially inequitable policies, making comparisons with the drug war, mass i BlueWaveNeverEnd Yesterday #2
Money brings out the best in people. twodogsbarking Yesterday #3
It would be a fun experiment to see how these people live with no money. erronis 23 hrs ago #4
I'd be the Wicked-Witch-of-the-West. chouchou 23 hrs ago #5
Matthew Bernard and Lynn Warner are assholes irisblue 22 hrs ago #6
I'm glad to see the protection of trees and the enforcement of environmental regulations being enforced. I remember Martin68 22 hrs ago #7
Entitled Rich People Held Accountable For Once North Coast Lawyer 22 hrs ago #8
So? Gofundme? DiverDave 22 hrs ago #10
I didn't know about tree law until 1997 when a man in my neighborhood... Jacson6 22 hrs ago #11
Good dave99 21 hrs ago #13
Legal fees would add to that if he had retained counsel. Even better. Auggie 22 hrs ago #12
Harsh, but necessary in order to prevent this kind of thing from happening in the future. Fil1957 3 hrs ago #14
Hopefully he kept enough wood to make himself a tiny violin. eggplant 2 hrs ago #15
Bernard...and crews he hired (including, allegedly, an arborist)...neighbor land flvegan 2 hrs ago #16
Message: Save your dime, don't do the crime. oasis 1 hr ago #17
Make them tear down the home they built..... SergeStorms 5 min ago #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»California landowners who...