Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stargleamer

(2,767 posts)
26. And even more egregious is 2 of them. . .
Wed May 6, 2026, 09:03 PM
16 hrs ago

(Scalia and Thomas) had conflicts of interest that demanded recusal. They had family working on Bush's behalf. I think Scalia's son & Ginny Thomas.

If the recount had continued, and all overvotes and undervotes had been checked for valid votes, Al Gore would have won and this current nightmare couldn't have started.

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That was good for a laugh stumpysbear 17 hrs ago #1
We, the public, are not the problem. C_U_L8R 17 hrs ago #2
We are too fucking stupid to understand displacedvermoter 17 hrs ago #3
Kiss my ass John, i have eyes. dem4decades 17 hrs ago #4
we didn't until you fucking HACKS came along Skittles 17 hrs ago #5
I believe this POS worked with Bush's team Stargleamer 17 hrs ago #6
FIVE REPUBLICAN-appointed justices voted to abrogate their duties niyad 16 hrs ago #18
And even more egregious is 2 of them. . . Stargleamer 16 hrs ago #26
Exactly!!!! niyad 16 hrs ago #34
I AM free to criticize. Hey Johnny. GFY. johnnyfins 17 hrs ago #7
Don't insult us with your b.s. Roberts. Diamond_Dog 17 hrs ago #8
As a retired empiricist, I suggest Roberts take an intro course in examining data. spooky3 17 hrs ago #9
Nailed it malaise 16 hrs ago #13
why, thank you! spooky3 16 hrs ago #15
The data speaks for itself malaise 16 hrs ago #16
He's gaslighting, and he knows it. And corrupt to the core. nt spooky3 16 hrs ago #17
Then there's this malaise 16 hrs ago #20
Piece of shit. nt spooky3 16 hrs ago #21
I never forgot it malaise 16 hrs ago #23
One of his colleagues just said progressivism can't exist in the USA. In It to Win It 16 hrs ago #24
LIAR.. add that to your legacy, John Roberts. nt Cha 16 hrs ago #10
If it walks like a duck, etc. niyad 16 hrs ago #11
Or, if it gaslights like a MAGA........ wnylib 16 hrs ago #43
TRANSLATION: Klansman in robes tries to blow smoke up our bums. B.See 16 hrs ago #12
Mr Balls and strikes can go F himself. themaguffin 16 hrs ago #14
This is like saying the car dealership exists to keep your maintenance costs low bucolic_frolic 16 hrs ago #19
Not wrongly. Not wrongly. Baitball Blogger 16 hrs ago #22
He's right, we shouldn't see them as political actors Terry_M 16 hrs ago #25
Anyone reading the Writings of Alito and Thomas know that Robert's is full of it. lostincalifornia 16 hrs ago #27
Poor John thinks we are ignorant ones MagickMuffin 16 hrs ago #28
Vain racist piggy so worried how history will view him that he's telling us what to think? Attilatheblond 16 hrs ago #29
That hack can pound sand. City Lights 16 hrs ago #30
He is so full of himself - TBF 16 hrs ago #31
What a load of bullshit... appmanga 16 hrs ago #32
+1. Roberts is a virulent racist and a traitor to the Constitution dalton99a 16 hrs ago #40
They are traitors enabling a coup against our democracy. Until they are removed it will continue to get worse. Blues Heron 16 hrs ago #33
lololol Give it up, dude. You're a piece of shit. Stop trying to convince people otherwise. Solly Mack 16 hrs ago #35
Geez, he is beyond pathetic... Spazito 16 hrs ago #36
yes Skittles 7 hrs ago #59
Then maybe the court shouldn't rule as if they are political actors... haele 16 hrs ago #37
If it walks like a duck....... vapor2 16 hrs ago #38
Political actors?? No way !! MW67 16 hrs ago #39
Also known as whores dalton99a 16 hrs ago #41
I'm not a lawyer but the 14th amendment article # 3 explicitly said that Trump could not run again Botany 16 hrs ago #42
Not actors. usonian 16 hrs ago #44
Why were 6 justices invited to dinner with trump/king charles??? IcyPeas 16 hrs ago #45
He's telling us not to believe our lying ears and eyes. tavernier 16 hrs ago #46
I think of them more as political puppets than political actors. dgauss 16 hrs ago #47
Says the guy angrychair 15 hrs ago #48
F Him. All they do is rule on politically charged issues Bristlecone 14 hrs ago #49
The whole abortion issue canetoad 14 hrs ago #50
Sorry, JR, the Fecal Matter Has Been Conspicuously Oozing from you and Your Lying Covert for Years Now The Roux Comes First 14 hrs ago #51
More like political, racist, malfeasant actors Scalded Nun 14 hrs ago #52
"Damn! It's getting so we get called partisan hacks every fuckin time we act like partisan hacks! It's so unfair!" struggle4progress 14 hrs ago #53
He said it with a straight face ? rickford66 14 hrs ago #54
Watch what they do, not what they say. ☮ walkingman 14 hrs ago #55
Yeah well, get glasses Johnny Bob. Dave Bowman 14 hrs ago #56
Hated the VRA since the early 80s? moondust 12 hrs ago #57
Thanks to RW SCOTUS justices... Jacson6 12 hrs ago #58
Anybody who is Federalist Society is anti-American. valleyrogue 7 hrs ago #60
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chief Justice John Robert...»Reply #26