Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(181,602 posts)
61. MaddowBlog-Why John Roberts' defense of the Supreme Court was so wildly unpersuasive
Thu May 7, 2026, 08:03 PM
20 hrs ago

Justices should consider not only why most believe the high court is motivated by politics, but also their own role in fueling the problem they find offensive.

Why John Roberts’ defense of the Supreme Court was so wildly unpersuasive www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...

Philly Joe (@joehick58.bsky.social) 2026-05-07T22:39:16.924Z

https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/john-roberts-defense-supreme-court-unpersuasive

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts is clearly aware of public perceptions related to the high court, though he apparently wants Americans to see him and fellow justices as above the political fray. The Associated Press reported on his latest public remarks:

I think, at a very basic level, people think we’re making policy decisions, we’re saying we think this is how things should be, as opposed to what the law provides,” he said. “I think they view us as purely political actors, which I don’t think is an accurate understanding of what we do.”

His remarks to a conference of judges and lawyers from the 3rd U.S. Circuit in Pennsylvania came at a time of low public confidence in the court, and about a week after the court handed down a decision that hollowed out the Voting Rights Act.


As part of the same remarks, Roberts went on to argue that sitting justices are not “part of the political process … and I’m not sure people grasp that as much as is appropriate.”.....

Why does the public see the justices, as Roberts put it, as “political actors”? It might have something to do with far-right justices issuing regressive and reactionary rulings. And far-right justices getting caught up in indefensible ethics controversies. And far-right justices elevating the presidency above the law.

But I suspect one of the main reasons so many people see justices as “political actors” is the frequency with which they act like political actors. Right around the same time that the public was learning about Roberts’ remarks, Justice Neil Gorsuch, who has a track record of chatting with conservative media personalities, appeared on a conservative podcast, talking about his belief that “young conservatives must have courage to stand by their beliefs.”....

Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut argued five years ago, “Judges turning into political actors, giving speeches attacking journalists, is terrible for the court and terrible for democracy.” Justices proceeded to ignore the warning.

The tarnishing of the Supreme Court — its credibility, its integrity and its reputation — has unfolded episodically over the course of several years. If Roberts and his brethren want to whine about public reactions to their work, that’s their right, but if they want to help restore the institution’s standing, they have an enormous amount of work to do. To date, they have shown no willingness whatsoever to even acknowledge the causes of the Supreme Court’s problems, much less take steps to address what ails it.

Roberts is a racist asshole who has been plotting to overturn or gut the Voting Rights Act since Roberts' days in the Reagan DOJ. I still remember reading the Shelby County opinion and dissent where Roberts gutted Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. That was NOT a legal opinion but a policy decision based on Roberts' belief that there was no longer racial prejudice. Alito's opinion is merely a continuation of the racist policies of the six asshole SCOTUS justices.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That was good for a laugh stumpysbear Wednesday #1
We, the public, are not the problem. C_U_L8R Wednesday #2
We are too fucking stupid to understand displacedvermoter Wednesday #3
Kiss my ass John, i have eyes. dem4decades Wednesday #4
we didn't until you fucking HACKS came along Skittles Wednesday #5
I believe this POS worked with Bush's team Stargleamer Wednesday #6
FIVE REPUBLICAN-appointed justices voted to abrogate their duties niyad Wednesday #18
And even more egregious is 2 of them. . . Stargleamer Wednesday #26
Exactly!!!! niyad Wednesday #34
Roberts, Kavanaugh and Coney-Barrett aided Bush in 2000 DemocracyForever 4 hrs ago #62
I AM free to criticize. Hey Johnny. GFY. johnnyfins Wednesday #7
Don't insult us with your b.s. Roberts. Diamond_Dog Wednesday #8
As a retired empiricist, I suggest Roberts take an intro course in examining data. spooky3 Wednesday #9
Nailed it malaise Wednesday #13
why, thank you! spooky3 Wednesday #15
The data speaks for itself malaise Wednesday #16
He's gaslighting, and he knows it. And corrupt to the core. nt spooky3 Wednesday #17
Then there's this malaise Wednesday #20
Piece of shit. nt spooky3 Wednesday #21
I never forgot it malaise Wednesday #23
One of his colleagues just said progressivism can't exist in the USA. In It to Win It Wednesday #24
LIAR.. add that to your legacy, John Roberts. nt Cha Wednesday #10
If it walks like a duck, etc. niyad Wednesday #11
Or, if it gaslights like a MAGA........ wnylib Wednesday #43
TRANSLATION: Klansman in robes tries to blow smoke up our bums. B.See Wednesday #12
Mr Balls and strikes can go F himself. themaguffin Wednesday #14
This is like saying the car dealership exists to keep your maintenance costs low bucolic_frolic Wednesday #19
Not wrongly. Not wrongly. Baitball Blogger Wednesday #22
He's right, we shouldn't see them as political actors Terry_M Wednesday #25
Anyone reading the Writings of Alito and Thomas know that Robert's is full of it. lostincalifornia Wednesday #27
Poor John thinks we are ignorant ones MagickMuffin Wednesday #28
Vain racist piggy so worried how history will view him that he's telling us what to think? Attilatheblond Wednesday #29
That hack can pound sand. City Lights Wednesday #30
He is so full of himself - TBF Wednesday #31
What a load of bullshit... appmanga Wednesday #32
+1. Roberts is a virulent racist and a traitor to the Constitution dalton99a Wednesday #40
They are traitors enabling a coup against our democracy. Until they are removed it will continue to get worse. Blues Heron Wednesday #33
lololol Give it up, dude. You're a piece of shit. Stop trying to convince people otherwise. Solly Mack Wednesday #35
Geez, he is beyond pathetic... Spazito Wednesday #36
yes Skittles Yesterday #59
Then maybe the court shouldn't rule as if they are political actors... haele Wednesday #37
If it walks like a duck....... vapor2 Wednesday #38
Political actors?? No way !! MW67 Wednesday #39
Also known as whores dalton99a Wednesday #41
I'm not a lawyer but the 14th amendment article # 3 explicitly said that Trump could not run again Botany Wednesday #42
Not actors. usonian Wednesday #44
Why were 6 justices invited to dinner with trump/king charles??? IcyPeas Wednesday #45
He's telling us not to believe our lying ears and eyes. tavernier Wednesday #46
I think of them more as political puppets than political actors. dgauss Wednesday #47
Says the guy angrychair Wednesday #48
F Him. All they do is rule on politically charged issues Bristlecone Wednesday #49
The whole abortion issue canetoad Wednesday #50
Sorry, JR, the Fecal Matter Has Been Conspicuously Oozing from you and Your Lying Covert for Years Now The Roux Comes First Wednesday #51
More like political, racist, malfeasant actors Scalded Nun Wednesday #52
"Damn! It's getting so we get called partisan hacks every fuckin time we act like partisan hacks! It's so unfair!" struggle4progress Wednesday #53
He said it with a straight face ? rickford66 Wednesday #54
Watch what they do, not what they say. ☮ walkingman Wednesday #55
Yeah well, get glasses Johnny Bob. Dave Bowman Wednesday #56
Hated the VRA since the early 80s? moondust Yesterday #57
Thanks to RW SCOTUS justices... Jacson6 Yesterday #58
Anybody who is Federalist Society is anti-American. valleyrogue Yesterday #60
MaddowBlog-Why John Roberts' defense of the Supreme Court was so wildly unpersuasive LetMyPeopleVote 20 hrs ago #61
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chief Justice John Robert...»Reply #61