Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SidneyR

(232 posts)
12. A king is not, at least in modern times, the same as a dictator. They are symbols of the nation, under the parliament.
Sun May 10, 2026, 09:50 PM
Yesterday

Even during the era of the American revolution, the king was not a dictator. In fact, what the colonial elites were fighting against (and getting the rest of the colonists to go along with) was the British parliament, which had already gained more power than the king. It's just that the king was an easier target, personified and convenient as a propaganda tool. The average colonist could easily identify with the king being the target. To focus on parliament would have confused them.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hegseth Is Sending Us a W...»Reply #12