Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ancianita

(43,414 posts)
21. First question, no.
Thu Jun 11, 2026, 08:16 PM
Thursday

Second question, maybe.

Cornyn's been highly critical of the administration's controversial DOJ fund, established to settle lawsuits brought by Trump and his allies. Cornyn labeled the fund a "terrible idea" and indicated he has probing questions for Blanche regarding his role in its creation. Since Cornyn lost his Texas primary bid, he has more political freedom to press Trump's nominees without loyalty concerns. With Republicans holding a narrow majority on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Cornyn’s vote—along with other uncommitted Republicans—could be pivotal.

Third question, no. There will be no surprises from our SJC Democrats.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Trump cant allow anyone in the Epstein files to be charged because his name would come up in their trial. LetMyPeopleVote Wednesday #1
Duh! malaise Wednesday #2
Psaki as well. sheshe2 Wednesday #4
Getting lots of coverage malaise Wednesday #5
It makes me sick! sheshe2 Wednesday #7
TY, LMPV, for all this valuable information Cha Wednesday #3
Makes one wonder how far back this coverup goes. Recall the first impeachment bucolic_frolic Wednesday #6
Wow you may be right about that FakeNoose Wednesday #8
Indeed it does. calimary Wednesday #9
The ENTIRE WHITE HOUSE IS A CRIME SCENE! sheshe2 Thursday #11
Here is the NYT article, paywall free.... reACTIONary Wednesday #10
Thank you. lamp_shade Thursday #12
Thanks. Kash, Bongino, and Pamela Jo never disappoint at being a disaster underpants 9 min ago #27
Of Course Blanche is at the center of the cover-up. He's Trump's personal attorney. Bondi was set up to fail ChicagoTeamster Thursday #13
Blanche committed fraud with the slush fund thing NY is going to disbar him GusBob Thursday #14
Not anytime soon. Here's why. ancianita Thursday #18
Times Exclusive- Inside the White House Freakout Over the Epstein Files (New York Times Gift Article) LetMyPeopleVote Thursday #15
Thank you. If Republicans actually read this article before the confirmation hearings, they still might ancianita Thursday #19
Question DET Thursday #20
First question, no. ancianita Thursday #21
Certainly explains why Trump is so eager to have Blanche lead the Justice Departmenr. Martin68 Thursday #16
So many should be disbarred at the least... him, Cannon... themaguffin Thursday #17
Oh gosh - Judge Cannon! calimary Thursday #22
She'd make a terrific..... SergeStorms Yesterday #23
Trump White House hunting for insider who leaked details about Epstein freakout: report LetMyPeopleVote 21 hrs ago #24
This cover-up is almost as bad as the job market. ck4829 2 hrs ago #25
DUH................... Lovie777 1 hr ago #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»House Dem Says 'Explosive...»Reply #21