Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(71,628 posts)
4. The next decision is Pung v. Isabella County, by Alito,
Tue Jun 23, 2026, 10:20 AM
Tuesday
The next decision is Pung v. Isabella County, by Alito,
Alito sometimes delivers very short summaries
Rory K. Little
Mod
10:16 AM
Wow this is going to be a very heavy reporter's day!
Amy Howe
Mod
10:17 AM
This was a challenge under both the Fifth Amendment’s takings clause (which bars the government from taking private property for public use without paying “just compensation”) and the Eighth Amendment’s ban on excessive fines. It arose when the state foreclosed on a house for failure to pay taxes and sold it for $76,000. The former homeowner got the difference between the taxes he owed ($2200) and the sale price, but then the buyer turned around and sold it again for much more. The former owner argued that he was entitled to the difference between the second sale price (which he says was the fair market value) and the taxes that he owed.
Zachary Shemtob
Mod
10:17 AM
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-95_dc8e.pdf
Mark Walsh
Mod
10:17 AM
No R numbers
Amy Howe
Mod
10:17 AM
The court holds that the "proper baseline ... is the price obtained in a tax sale, at least when the sale is fairly conducted in light of our country's history of tax sales."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SCOTUSblog: Starts Jun 23...»Reply #4