BREAKING: The Supreme Court rules 6-3 in favor of the Trump admin on Temporary Protected Status [View all]
The final SCOTUS opinion today is Mullin v. Doe. Alito has the 6-3 opinion, holding that the temporary protected status statute bars court review of non-constitutional claims and the Haiti plaintiffs are unlikely to succeed in their equal protection claim. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...
— Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner.bsky.social) 2026-06-25T14:26:01.660Z
The Supreme Court of the United States has concluded, as a matter of law, that Donald Trump and his administration's racism and vitriol toward Haitians—in its termination of TPS—is not "overtly racial."
— Cristian Farias (@cristianfarias.com) 2026-06-25T14:34:13.808Z
Justice Kagan, in dissent, calls them out:
www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...
BREAKING: The Supreme Court rules 6-3 in favor of the Trump admin on Temporary Protected Status, blocking the lawsuit on jurisdictional grounds, allowing DHS to strip over 350,000 people of legal status even though they utterly failed to follow the required legal procedures.
— Aaron Reichlin-Melnick (@reichlinmelnick.bsky.social) 2026-06-25T14:25:39.067Z
The Supreme Court ALSO gives Trump another pass on racism, declaring that his horrific and bigoted comments against Haitians are actually not evidence of racism and that the plaintiffs cannot show evidence of racial bias, essentially plugging their ears and letting Trump spew filth as policy.
— Aaron Reichlin-Melnick (@reichlinmelnick.bsky.social) 2026-06-25T14:34:33.058Z
Fourth (and *last*) ruling from #SCOTUS is in TPS.
— Steve Vladeck (@stevevladeck.bsky.social) 2026-06-25T14:24:02.124Z
For the usual 6-3 majority, Justice Alito holds that federal law forecloses judicial review of statutory challenges to the executive branch's termination of temporary protected status for Haiti, Syria, etc.:
www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...
With seven decisions with the *same* 6-3 lineup over the last three days, I really can't wait for all of the hot takes from the folks who keep insisting that #SCOTUS *isn't* defined by its ideological division.
— Steve Vladeck (@stevevladeck.bsky.social) 2026-06-25T14:34:44.884Z
= new reply since forum marked as read