'Something stinks': Elon Musk, congressional Republicans target Democrats' main fundraising machine

[BumRushDaShow]

22. "Does that change the facts?"

You need to delete it. Promoting RW loonery on DU is not a good look.

I actually went out of my way and avoided the right wing outlets I’m familiar with. It was hard to find that article because of all the hullabaloo over this latest bullshit. So I copied what I thought was a safe link.

I was aware of it and got the info I posted about easily from a search of the name.

Does this source meet your approval? Or do I need to keep looking? https://electionlawblog.org/?p=148844

https://www.influencewatch.org/person/richard-l-hasen/

It's the TOS you need to keep in mind about.

Your first link doesn't touch on what the OP is describing regarding Musrat's attempts at attacking Democratic Party fund-raising entities and your second link about the author of that latest article is from yet another RW loon site - "Influence Watch" -

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/influence-watch/

Influence Watch – Bias and Credibility

RIGHT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.

Overall, we rate Influence Watch Right Biased based on the left-leaning sources they more frequently profile, as well as the use of loaded words such as “extremist” to describe liberal policy. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.

But I am not surprised in the least.