Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

BumRushDaShow

(156,311 posts)

2. "Allowing Garcia back would mean him being called before committees to reveal torture and abuse."

Reply to Miguelito Loveless (Reply #1)

Fri May 16, 2025, 11:18 AM

May 16

Congress has a SCIF and have had many interviews/interrogatories, etc, in that environment. And I would expect that in this case, they could always "play dumb" and claim that it didn't happen in a U.S. prison so "it wasn't them".

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge in Abrego Garcia case to review whether Trump administration can keep case details secret [View all] BumRushDaShow May 16 OP

Historically, Miguelito Loveless May 16 #1

"Allowing Garcia back would mean him being called before committees to reveal torture and abuse." BumRushDaShow May 16 #2

The Judge should return him to the US azureblue May 16 #3

What would be the reason for State secrets? bluestarone May 16 #4