Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(37,290 posts)

14. None are needed.

Fri May 23, 2025, 07:01 PM

May 23

The rules of procedure and legal ethics make the attorney responsible for everything in the filling, regardless of how it was put together.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge considers sanctions against attorneys in prison case for using AI in court filings [View all] BumRushDaShow May 23 OP

The key word is "considers" gab13by13 May 23 #1

"Hallucinations" is the term to humanize AI errors. bucolic_frolic May 23 #2

Hallucinations are very different than errors Jose Garcia May 23 #9

Considering?! PJMcK May 23 #3

AI isn't referenced in The Federal Rules of Evidence, is it? no_hypocrisy May 23 #4

Judges sure like to waste time "considering" Balatro May 23 #5

I love how they call these "hallucinations" BumRushDaShow May 23 #7

I think they have told the judge to pound sand. republianmushroom May 23 #8

No shock to me that this happened in Alabama. Baitball Blogger May 23 #10

Calling it an "incorrect citation" is misleading fujiyamasan May 23 #11

None are needed. Ms. Toad May 23 #14

The verification is the most important point about generative AI fujiyamasan May 24 #15