Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(158,245 posts)
Mon Jun 2, 2025, 03:15 PM Jun 2

GOP bill buries bombshell: only the rich could sue to stop Trump's abuses [View all]

Source: Raw Story

June 2, 2025 4:38AM ET


A single paragraph buried deep in a spending bill that passed the GOP-controlled House of Representatives earlier this month is causing growing concern among democracy watchdogs who warn the provision will make it so only the well-to-do would be in a good position to launch legal challenges against a Trump administration that has shown over and over again its disdain and disregard for oversight or judicial restraint of any kind.

Coming just about half-way through what President Donald Trump has dubbed the Republican Party's so-called "One Big Beautiful Bill Act"—which progressive critics point out is a giant giveaway to the nation's wealthiest at the expense of the working class and the common good—the language in question is slight, but could have far-reaching impacts.

"This is what autocrats do. Consolidate power, increase the penalty for objecting, ultimately making it more difficult—eventually impossible—to challenge them." On Saturday, Human Rights Watch (HRW) noted in a detailed social media thread how the provision "hasn't gotten nearly enough scrutiny" from lawmakers or the public.

A recent piece by USA Today columnist Chris Brennan put it this way:

One paragraph, on pages 562 and 563 of the 1,116-page bill, raised alarms for reasons that have nothing to do with America's budget or safety-net programs or debt. That paragraph invokes a federal rule for civil court procedures, requiring anyone seeking an injunction or temporary restraining order to block an action by the Trump administration to post a financial bond. Want to challenge Trump? Pay up, the provision said in a way that could make it financially prohibitive for Americans to contest Trump's actions in court.




Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/gop-bill-buries-bombshell-only-the-rich-could-sue-to-stop-trumps-abuses/
25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Most of us are blaming Trump for the bad shit, Dan Jun 2 #1
This could not be more true. It bears repetition. dchill Jun 2 #6
The rich just enjoy fucking us all. And wish we would die. I am thoroughly disgusted with the abuse. n/t Evolve Dammit Jun 2 #2
The rich are sociopath parasites upon I_UndergroundPanther Jun 2 #17
Serious Shit Canada Kid Jun 2 #3
The only thing I disagree with is that time is of the essence. They have spent decades studying live love laugh Jun 3 #21
This is how authoritarianism legalizes itself. WMDemocract Jun 2 #4
Or a bunch of luigis I_UndergroundPanther Jun 2 #18
This bill has to pass the Senate by budget reconciliation, doesn't it? wryter2000 Jun 2 #5
I think that you are correct. markodochartaigh Jun 2 #7
That's how it's supposed to work BumRushDaShow Jun 2 #8
The parlimentarian already said this (and the 'can't enforce contempt orders' clause) were improper PSPS Jun 2 #15
Thought there were already ops on this? mwmisses4289 Jun 2 #9
Since Congress has come back from it's break BumRushDaShow Jun 2 #10
Ah, that makes sense. mwmisses4289 Jun 2 #11
Whenever there is a federal holiday BumRushDaShow Jun 2 #12
(Imagine a decisive snort)🤨🙄 mwmisses4289 Jun 2 #13
Well my Congressman had a stroke last year BumRushDaShow Jun 2 #14
" hasn't gotten enough scrutiny " ??? WHY!!!! Firestorm49 Jun 2 #16
So, How Is This Legal? DallasNE Jun 3 #19
This has been obvious to me already. It's Trump's MO. live love laugh Jun 3 #20
Probably not constitutional. Baitball Blogger Jun 3 #22
Can't a bond be crowd-sourced? FakeNoose Jun 3 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author Lasher Jun 3 #24
Who cares. The important issue in America is men playing in women's sports!!11!! progressoid Jun 3 #25
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»GOP bill buries bombshell...