Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

ToxMarz

(2,525 posts)

1. "And using AI for coding results in errors that might not be caught."

Reply to highplainsdem (Original post)

Tue Jun 3, 2025, 10:17 AM

Jun 3

The time and cost to have experienced programmers to review, catch and fix the errors is pretty much the same as just having professional programmers in the first place. It has to be done, and you probably would get a better solution. There is an allure to calling everything AI (personnaly I find it off putting) that commands $$$.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

AI 'vibe coding' startups burst onto scene with sky-high valuations [View all] highplainsdem Jun 3 OP

"And using AI for coding results in errors that might not be caught." ToxMarz Jun 3 #1

Right, so who reviews the code for errors? Miguelito Loveless Jun 3 #2