Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Torchlight

(5,369 posts)

13. A rather huge disparity between 'no longer functional' and 'obliterates'

Reply to Richard D (Original post)

Fri Jun 27, 2025, 12:19 PM

Jun 27

I have a three year old computer no longer functional, but it will this weekend. On the other hand, I obliterated a Vega in 1988... and it's never been seen since.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

IAEA chief: Fordow centrifuges 'no longer operational' after US bunker-buster strikes [View all] Richard D Jun 26 OP

unless they were moved? Kali Jun 26 #1

I'm far from an expert . . . Richard D Jun 26 #3

Yes Kali Jun 26 #4

No one claims there was no damage. The question isn't whether the centrifuges are currently operational... thesquanderer Jun 26 #2

"A Global Inventory of Organized Social Media Manipulation" - Oxford University Press ForgoTheConsequence Jun 26 #5

Please find . . . Richard D Jun 26 #6

Weird. ForgoTheConsequence Jun 27 #11

Media Bias Fact Check Beastly Boy Jun 26 #7

There are many other sources as well. Richard D Jun 26 #8

This story from the UK Telegraph seems to be a good compilation of Deminpenn Jun 27 #9

centrifuges are usually detected via heat signature, because they require a lot of concentrated power. Javaman Jun 27 #10

LOL: How do you know? Prairie Gates Jun 27 #12

A rather huge disparity between 'no longer functional' and 'obliterates' Torchlight Jun 27 #13