Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Uncle Joe

(62,188 posts)
39. I said both American and International Law
Sun Jun 29, 2025, 03:22 PM
Jun 29

Overview: Protecting the
Vulnerable in War
International humanitarian law (IHL) is
a set of rules that seek for humanitarian
reasons to limit the effects of armed
conflict. IHL protects persons who are
not or who are no longer participating in
hostilities and it restricts the means and
methods of warfare. IHL is also known
as the law of war and the law of armed
conflict.

A major part of international
humanitarian law is contained in the
four Geneva Conventions of 1949 that
have been adopted by all nations in
the world. The Conventions have been
expanded and supplemented by two
further agreements: the Additional
Protocols of 1977, relating to the
protection of victims of armed conflicts,
and the 2005 Additional Protocol III,
relating to the adoption of an additional
distinctive emblem.

These Conventions provide specific
rules to safeguard combatants, or
members of the armed forces, who
are wounded, sick or shipwrecked,
prisoners of war, and civilians, as well
as medical personnel, military chaplains
and civilian support workers of the
military.

(snip)

https://www.redcross.org/content/dam/redcross/atg/PDF_s/International_Services/International_Humanitarian_Law/IHL_SummaryGenevaConv.pdf?srsltid=AfmBOoqYZU9GHZnVRyO-hSSwRbc0bbNUstz7r5tIiCNd1RvCS7IOvXSv

+

Experts hail ICJ declaration on illegality of Israel’s presence in the occupied Palestinian territory as “historic” for Palestinians and international law

(snip)

The landmark ruling of 19 July 2024 declared that Israel’s occupation of the Gaza strip and the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, is unlawful, along with the associated settlement regime, annexation and use of natural resources. The Court added that Israel's legislation and measures violate the international prohibition on racial segregation and apartheid. The ICJ mandated Israel to end its occupation, dismantle its settlements, provide full reparations to Palestinian victims and facilitate the return of displaced people.

“The advisory opinion reaffirms peremptory norms prohibiting annexation, settlements, racial segregation and apartheid, and should be seen as declaratory in nature and binding on Israel and all States supporting the occupation,” the experts said.

The Court refuted the notion that Palestinian self-determination must be achieved solely through bilateral negotiations with Israel – a requirement that has subjected Palestinians to violence, dispossession and rights violations for 30 years.

“The Court has finally reaffirmed a principle that seemed unclear, even to the United Nations: Freedom from foreign military occupation, racial segregation and apartheid is absolutely non-negotiable,” the experts said.

(snip)

https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2024/07/experts-hail-icj-declaration-illegality-israels-presence-occupied

+

Israel Not Complying with World Court Order in Genocide Case

Failing to Ensure Basic Services, Aid

(The Hague, February 26, 2024) – The Israeli government has failed to comply with at least one measure in the legally binding order from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in South Africa’s genocide case, Human Rights Watch said today. Citing warnings about “catastrophic conditions” in Gaza, the court ordered Israel on January 26, 2024, to “take immediate and effective measures to enable the provision of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian aid,” and to report back on its compliance to the specific measures “within one month.”

One month later, however, Israel continues to obstruct the provision of basic services and the entry and distribution within Gaza of fuel and lifesaving aid, acts of collective punishment that amount to war crimes and include the use of starvation of civilians as a weapon of war. Fewer trucks have entered Gaza and fewer aid missions have been permitted to reach northern Gaza in the several weeks since the ruling than in the weeks preceding it, according to United Nations Office of the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA).

(snip)

https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/02/26/israel-not-complying-world-court-order-genocide-case

+

1. What is the Leahy law?

The term “Leahy law” refers to two statutory provisions prohibiting the U.S. Government from using funds for assistance to units of foreign security forces where there is credible information implicating that unit in the commission of gross violations of human rights (GVHR). One statutory provision applies to the State Department and the other applies to the Department of Defense. The State Department Leahy law was made permanent under section 620M of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, 22 U.S.C. 2378d. The U.S. government considers torture, extrajudicial killing, enforced disappearance, and rape under color of law as GVHRs when implementing the Leahy law. Incidents are examined on a fact-specific basis. The State Department Leahy law includes an exception permitting resumption of assistance to a unit if the Secretary of State determines and reports to Congress that the government of the country is taking effective steps to bring the responsible members of the security forces unit to justice.

The DoD Leahy law is similar to the State Leahy law. Since 1999, Congress included the DoD Leahy law in its annual appropriations act. The DoD Leahy law is now permanent in Section 362 of Title 10 of the U.S. Code. It requires that DoD-appropriated funds may not be used for any training, equipment, or other assistance for a foreign security force unit if the Secretary of Defense has credible information that such unit has committed a GVHR. The law allows for two exceptions to this restriction. The first in cases where the Secretary of Defense (after consultation with the Secretary of State) determines that the government of that country has taken all necessary corrective steps. This first exception is also known as “remediation.” A second exception exists if U.S. equipment or other assistance is necessary to assist in disaster relief operations or other humanitarian or national security emergencies.

(snip)

https://www.state.gov/bureau-of-democracy-human-rights-and-labor/releases/2025/01/leahy-law-fact-sheet


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

so, we do not support israel unless they allow corruption? rampartd Jun 29 #1
Or maybe cede Gaza land to the trump kids... mpcamb Jun 29 #3
It could be a good investment per Jared Kushner, Uncle Joe Jun 29 #11
Bribery is the only thing the corrupt, orange POS knows. sinkingfeeling Jun 29 #2
Fun Fact FredGarvin Jun 29 #4
The ones that live outside of big cities and Ilsa Jun 29 #6
Shhh... BumRushDaShow Jun 29 #9
Definitely a teacher & a "rabbi rouser"!! Ilsa Jun 29 #22
HA! mahina Jun 29 #27
Jesus wept Bayard Jun 29 #21
Wait till they find out Israelis get free healthcare and can have abortions mahina Jun 29 #26
When was BN ever a war hero? Ilsa Jun 29 #5
Bibi is a war criminal, not a war hero. Lonestarblue Jun 29 #16
Actually, he was DavidDvorkin Jun 29 #33
Then I must take my comment back. Ilsa Jun 29 #46
It surprised me, too DavidDvorkin Jun 29 #47
Good. travelingthrulife Jun 29 #7
Yes. No more funds for genocide or wars of aggression... AloeVera Jun 29 #30
"very similar to the" attempts at accountability "that I was forced to endure" William Seger Jun 29 #8
So threatning to withhold aid from Israel to exert momentary political leverage is bad. Beastly Boy Jun 29 #10
No, threatening to withhold aid from Israel to support corruption of that nation's government is bad. n/t Uncle Joe Jun 29 #12
I agree. So I don't get the "No" in your response. Beastly Boy Jun 29 #14
That's where we differ Uncle Joe Jun 29 #15
Very Well Stated :: Thank You Uncle Joe (n/t) wyn borkins Jun 29 #17
What do you thinl political leverage is? Beastly Boy Jun 29 #23
I make a major distinction between using political leverage to undercut the law and that of promoting it. Uncle Joe Jun 29 #24
Trump also tried to use his "political leverage" to withhold $391M from Ukraine unless they investigated Biden. sop Jun 29 #31
The way I see it, Uncle Joe Jun 29 #32
You will have to be more specific than that. Beastly Boy Jun 29 #34
It's not complicated, *rump is trying to undercut Israeli law and justice vs Uncle Joe Jun 29 #35
Stopping the sale of offensive weapons to Israel has nothing to do with international law. Beastly Boy Jun 29 #36
It does if you respect the Geneva Conventions or the Leahy Law. n/t Uncle Joe Jun 29 #37
Leahy is an amendment, and not to international law. Beastly Boy Jun 29 #38
I said both American and International Law Uncle Joe Jun 29 #39
Thanks for the references. Beastly Boy Jun 29 #40
The Geneva Conventions sets the guidelines for humanitarian law which Netanyahu's government is violating Uncle Joe Jun 29 #41
The Geneva Conventions do not set the rules for military aid from one state to the aother. Beastly Boy Jun 29 #42
I never said the Geneva Conventions set the rules for military trade from one state to another. Uncle Joe Jun 29 #43
Then you deflected. Beastly Boy Jun 29 #44
It's obvious to anyone witnessing what's going on in Gaza, that crimes against humanity is pervasive. Uncle Joe Jun 29 #45
Keep Bibi Free Kid Berwyn Jun 29 #13
Sarcasm, I presume....it's our patriotic duty to stop these endless wars walkingman Jun 29 #18
Really is tough to make sense of insanity. Kid Berwyn Jun 29 #19
More prosecution is persecution Bayard Jun 29 #20
Mob bosses, both mahina Jun 29 #25
Trump just found out he couldn't pardon Bibi. sop Jun 29 #28
War hero? He's a damn war criminal. And a crook. Dave Bowman Jun 29 #29
Just buying a pardon before the verdict is announced. republianmushroom Monday #48
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump suggests billions f...»Reply #39