Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DBoon

(23,930 posts)
10. karma strikes
Sun Jun 29, 2025, 04:53 PM
Jun 29

grazing animals (cattle, sheep) make the most contribution to global warming.

Interesting that global warming would result in the spread of a severe allergy to these products.

per Scientific American:

In truth, every food we consume, vegetables and fruits included, incurs hidden environmental costs: transportation, refrigeration and fuel for farming, as well as methane emissions from plants and animals, all lead to a buildup of atmospheric greenhouse gases. Take asparagus: in a report prepared for the city of Seattle, Daniel J. Morgan of the University of Washington and his co-workers found that growing just half a pound of the vegetable in Peru emits greenhouse gases equivalent to 1.2 ounces of CO2 as a result of applying insecticide and fertilizer, pumping water and running heavy, gas-guzzling farm equipment. To refrigerate and transport the vegetable to an American dinner table generates another two ounces of CO2-equivalent greenhouse gases, for a total CO2 equivalent of 3.2 ounces.

But that is nothing compared to beef. In 1999 Susan Subak, an ecological economist then at the University of East Anglia in England, found that, depending on the production method, cows emit between 2.5 and 4.7 ounces of methane for each pound of beef they produce. Because methane has roughly 23 times the global-warming potential of CO2, those emissions are the equivalent of releasing between 3.6 and 6.8 pounds of CO2 into the atmosphere for each pound of beef produced.

Raising animals also requires a large amount of feed per unit of body weight. In 2003 Lucas Reijnders of the University of Amsterdam and Sam Soret of Loma Linda University estimated that producing a pound of beef protein for the table requires more than 10 pounds of plant protein with all the emissions of greenhouse gases that grain farming entails. Finally, farms for raising animals produce numerous wastes that give rise to greenhouse gases.


https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-greenhouse-hamburger/

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Those of us who are vegans have been planning this for years (just kidding)! waterwatcher123 Jun 29 #1
I knew it ! (haha) ShepKat Jun 29 #2
Kind of like the Covid pandemic was a godsend for us introverted people with Asperger's. LiberalArkie Jun 29 #4
I was gonna say.... CousinIT Jun 29 #5
When we get to the point of eating people, go for the Vegans Lochloosa Jun 29 #6
lol Mossfern Jun 29 #7
Okay--I'm keeping that one! Bayard Jun 29 #15
No, by that time you will be infected by the ticks and the only palatable alternative will tofu or tempeh. waterwatcher123 Jul 1 #20
The ticks are hiding in the hamburger buns. chouchou Jun 29 #3
I have mixed feelings about this Mossfern Jun 29 #8
I've said it before and I'll say it again. This is the ABSOLUTE worst time in history for us to go fascist. We literally Karasu Jun 29 #9
karma strikes DBoon Jun 29 #10
Food waste is also exacerbating GHG emissions Envirogal Jun 29 #11
We have a law about that in California Unwind Your Mind Jun 29 #14
The horticulturist interviewed is a friend of mine electricmonk Jun 29 #12
'Explosive increase' of ticks that cause meat allergy in US due to climate crisis LDN Jun 29 #13
That is so bizarre Bayard Jun 29 #16
Of course all reporting will be from out of the country Old Crank Jun 30 #17
The link I posted above electricmonk Jun 30 #19
Well, Climate Change has been repealed, so that can't possibly be why the ticks are spreading. maxsolomon Jun 30 #18
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Explosive increase' of t...»Reply #10