Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

progree

(12,241 posts)
25. LINKS to some BLS Data Series Numbers and Graphs -
Thu Jul 3, 2025, 09:57 AM
Jul 3

And yes, the monthly increases are net gains. The reported nonfarm payroll jobs increases are jobs created and job openings filled minus jobs lost: https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143221098#post24

AND SEASONALLY ADJUSTED - pretty much all the numbers you see reported in the media or BLS summary are the seasonally adjusted ones -- that certainly is true of the headline numbers -- nonfarm payroll jobs, unemployment rate -- as well as many others like the labor force participation rate. (I'm tired of seeing comments like the payroll jobs number is high this time because we're getting into the holiday hiring season, or low because we're done with the holiday season, or it's slow in August etc. Seasonal adjustments adjust for these seasonal cycles - that's why they are called seasonal adjustments)




BLS news release summary: https://bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm

The headline payroll job numbers (+147,000 in June come from the Establishment Survey
https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001
Monthly changes (in thousands): https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001?output_view=net_1mth
YEAR: JAN FEB MAR etc.
2022: 225 869 471 305 241 461 696 237 227 400 297 126
2023: 444 306 85 216 227 257 148 157 158 186 141 269
2024: 119 222 246 118 193 87 88 71 240 44 261 323
2025: 111 102 120 158 144 147
The last 2 months (May and June) are preliminary, subject to revisions

Last 12 months: 151k/month average

# Employed in thousands (up 93,000 in June) come from the separate Household Survey, http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12000000
Monthly changes (in thousands): http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12000000?output_view=net_1mth
If one adjusts the date range from 2021 to 2025, the graph is much more meaningful because it leaves out the huge swings of 2020 that greatly enlarges the Y axis and makes what follows look like tiny almost undiscernible squiggles around the zero axis
YEAR: JAN FEB MAR etc.
2022 1016 483 608 --315 487 --284 164 477 75 --126 --177 752
2023 958 178 417 162 --178 183 204 292 --33 --231 675 --762
2024 66 --177 412 70 --331 --9 64 206 377 --346 --273 478
2025 2234 --588 201 436 --696 93

Last 12 months: 184k/month average
January and February of each year are affected by changes in population controls.
A very volatile data series from month to month. I used a double minus to make the negative ones stand out a little better
This Household Survey also produces the unemployment rate and labor force participation rate among many other stats

REVISIONS of the prior 2 months: up 16,000, from the BLS news release:
https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm

The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for April was revised up by 11,000, from
+147,000 to +158,000, and the change for May was revised up by 5,000, from +139,000 to
+144,000. With these revisions, employment in April and May combined is 16,000 higher than
previously reported. (Monthly revisions result from additional reports received from
businesses and government agencies since the last published estimates and from the
recalculation of seasonal factors.)

So compared to the report that came out one month ago we have 147,000 + 16,000 = +163,000 net new payroll jobs reported.

The June 6 report's total nonfarm payroll employment: 159,561k
. . . https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_06062025.htm -- Table B-1
This (July 3 report's) total nonfarm payroll employment: 159,724k -- a 163k increase
. . . This month's: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_07032025.htm or https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t17.htm or https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001

###############################################################
###############################################################

LINKS to some BLS Data Series Numbers and Graphs

Table A - Summary of Household Survey (produces unemployment rate, labor force participation rate) - https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.a.htm

Table B - Summary of Establishment Survey (produces the headline payroll jobs number and the average earnings) - https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.b.htm

Every one of these data series comes with a table and graph:

# Nonfarm Employment (Establishment Survey, https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001
Monthly changes (in thousands): https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001?output_view=net_1mth
   NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CEU0000000001

# Employed in thousands from the separate Household Survey, http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12000000
Monthly changes (in thousands): http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12000000?output_view=net_1mth
   NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU02000000

# Nonfarm PRIVATE Employment (Establishment Survey, https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0500000001
Monthly changes: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0500000001?output_view=net_1mth
    ^-Good for comparison to the ADP report that typically comes out a few days earlier
NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CEU0500000001

Earnings of Production and Non-Supervisor Workers (PANSW)
. . . # INFLATION ADJUSTED Hourly Earnings of PANSW http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0500000032
. . . # INFLATION ADJUSTED Weekly Earnings of PANSW http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0500000031
----- Nominal means NOT inflation adjusted. Just plain ordinary greenbacks ----
. . . # Nominal Hourly Earnings of PANSW- http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0500000008
. . . # Nominal Weekly Earnings of PANSW - http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0500000030

# Labor Force http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11000000?output_view=net_1mth
The labor force is the sum of employed and unemployed. To count as unemployed, one must have actively sought work in the past 4 weeks (just looking at want ads and job postings doesn't count)

# ETPR (Employment-To-Population Ratio) aka Employment Rate http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12300000

# LFPR (Labor Force Participation rate) http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000

Unemployed, Unemployment Rate
# Unemployed http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS13000000
# Unemployment rate http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000
    # Black unemployment rate (%), https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000006
    # Hispanic or Latino unemployment rate (%), https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000009
    # White unemployment rate (%), https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000003
# U-6 unemployment rate http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS13327709
# Long term unemployed 27 weeks or longer as a percent of total unemployed http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS13025703
------------ end unemployed, unemployment rates --------

# NILF -- Not in Labor Force http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS15000000

# NILF-WJ -- Not in Labor Force, Wants Job http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS15026639

# Part-Time Workers who want Full-Time Jobs (Table A-8's Part-Time For Economic Reasons) http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12032194

# Part-Time Workers (Table A-9) http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12600000

# Full-Time Workers (Table A-9) http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12500000

# Multiple Job holders (Table A-9) - http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12026619

# Multiple Jobholders as a Percent of Employed (Table A-9) https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12026620

# Civilian non-institutional population
Seasonally adjusted (they seem to have gotten rid of this) https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS10000000
NOT seasonally adjusted: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU00000000
. . In Table A-1 https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t01.htm they show the same numbers for seasonally adjusted and non-seasonally adjusted

LFPR - Labor Force Participation Rate for some age groups
The LFPR is the Employed + jobless people who have looked for work in the last 4 weeks (and say they want a job and are able to take one if offered. Looking for work involves more than just looking at job listings). All divided by the civilian non-institutional population age 16+ (in the case of the regular LFPR, or divided by the civilian non-institutional population of whatever age, gender, race etc. for the various sub-demographic measures. For example. the LFPR of age 25-54 females is the number of those employed or actively seeking work divided by the civilian non-institutional population of age 25-54 females.)

SA means Seasonally adjusted. NSA means Not Seasonally Adjusted
16+: SA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000 NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU01300000
25-34: SA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300089 NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU01300089
25-54 ("Prime Age" ): SA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300060 NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU01300060
. . . . . . Prime Age Men: SA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300061
. . . . . . . . . . . .From Jan 1960 to Jan 2025, Prime Age Men LFPR went from 97.1% to 89.4%. That means that the percent not in the labor force went from 2.9% to 10.6%, a 3.7 fold increase in this proportion.
. . . . . . Prime Age Women: SA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300062
55-64: -------------------- NSA: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU01300095
55+: SA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11324230 NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU01324230
65+: SA: ---------------- NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU01300097

LFPR - Labor Force Particpation Rate (prime age 25-54) by gender
All: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300060
Men: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300061
Women: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300062

More LFPR links including by race: https://www.democraticunderground.com/111695870

ETPR - Employment to Population Ratio for some age groups
SA means Seasonally adjusted. NSA means Not Seasonally Adjusted
16+: SA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12300000 NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU02300000
25-34: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12300089 NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU02300089
25-54 ("Prime Age" ): SA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12300060 NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU02300060
55-64: SA: ---------------- NSA: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU02300095
55+: SA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12324230 NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU02324230
65+: SA: ---------------- NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU02300097

Data series finder (employment/unemployment related): https://www.bls.gov/data/#employment

The entire report: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf

Inflation rate (CPI)
. . . Monthly report: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm
. . . Regular CPI: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CUSR0000SA0?output_view=pct_1mth
. . . Core CPI: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CUSR0000SA0L1E?output_view=pct_1mth
. . . Energy: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CUSR0000SA0E?output_view=pct_1mth
. . . Food: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CUSR0000SAF1?output_view=pct_1mth
. . . Food at home (groceries): https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CUSR0000SAF11?output_view=pct_1mth
. . . Calculator at: https://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm
. . . One Screen Data Search for CPI components: https://data.bls.gov/PDQWeb/cu

Grocery prices (food at home) inflation compared to overall inflation rate
. . . . . https://www.in2013dollars.com/Food-at-home/price-inflation
. . . From 1947 to 2021 and from 2000 to 2021, food at home inflation very slightly lagged the overall inflation rate
. . . . . https://www.democraticunderground.com/10142735789


Archives of previous reports - The monthly payroll employment reports from the BLS are archived at Archived News Releases (https://www.bls.gov/bls/news-release/ ). In the list up at the top, under Major Economic Indicators, select Employment Situation ( https://www.bls.gov/bls/news-release/empsit.htm ). That opens up links to reports going back to 1994.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Is the economic data being manipulated? Doodley Jul 3 #1
Due to all the court halts BumRushDaShow Jul 3 #4
Those numbers don't reflect what I see where I live mdbl Jul 3 #14
I, for one, do not believe this governmeont report. sinkingfeeling Jul 3 #2
I share your disbelief - it used to be adjusted months later rurallib Jul 3 #9
How come no Democrats are questioning the numbers? SCantiGOP Jul 3 #37
For reference, last month mahatmakanejeeves Jul 3 #3
I know that progree had been tracking the LPR for awhile BumRushDaShow Jul 3 #7
No worries... Hugin Jul 3 #5
The numbers reported are always seasonally adjusted. You don't need to use scare quotes. mathematic Jul 3 #27
Using so-called scare quotes is my right and privilege. Hugin Jul 3 #32
Kiss your rats cut goodbye, Krasnov speak easy Jul 3 #6
This doesn't jibe with the loss of 33,000 private sector jobs Ritabert Jul 3 #8
This article from yesterday (before this info was released) may provides some perspective... thesquanderer Jul 3 #11
Thanks but I still find the BLS finding questionable Ritabert Jul 3 #17
From CBS, 'Layoffs reach highest level since 2020, new data shows.' Hotler Jul 3 #23
That I believe. Ritabert Jul 3 #60
i know! I saw that as well..... samnsara Jul 3 #30
Yesterday's report was based on ADP figures, which aren't reliable. PSPS Jul 3 #38
I believe them over BLS. Ritabert Jul 3 #61
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 3 #10
lol. ok then. travelingthrulife Jul 3 #12
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 3 #13
Seems kind of odd given that private jobs were -33,000. travelingthrulife Jul 3 #15
Private jobs were +74k, not -33k. mathematic Jul 3 #21
so you are saying America is Great Again? uncle ray Jul 3 #16
Many people simply don't believe ANYTHING coming from the tRump administration groundloop Jul 3 #18
You actually believe this crap? And you joined DU just to post how great you think the regime is doing? sinkingfeeling Jul 3 #19
Sure we can Javaman Jul 3 #28
What do you credit this fantastic news to? Tariffs? marble falls Jul 3 #29
Why should we trust that this data wasn't manipulated, in light of everything else we know? nt pnwmom Jul 3 #64
Welcome to DU IronLionZion Jul 3 #20
What do you credit for that excellent news? marble falls Jul 3 #26
Welcome to DU. It's nice to see you. littlemissmartypants Jul 3 #62
Welcome to DU LetMyPeopleVote Jul 3 #67
Looks like they cooked the private payroll figure Historic NY Jul 3 #22
ADP's private-payroll customers are concentrated in small-business sector PSPS Jul 3 #39
This message was self-deleted by its author PennRalphie Jul 3 #24
"When I suggested that the booming economy should have been a major campaign." BumRushDaShow Jul 3 #31
This message was self-deleted by its author PennRalphie Jul 3 #33
Here in SE PA, we were IINUNDATED with ads BumRushDaShow Jul 3 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author PennRalphie Jul 3 #40
So you were watching EVERY media format 24/7 in order to determine that? BumRushDaShow Jul 3 #43
This message was self-deleted by its author PennRalphie Jul 3 #49
These people CHOSE to respond to cultural/wedge issues BumRushDaShow Jul 3 #53
This message was self-deleted by its author PennRalphie Jul 3 #56
I think the complete over-saturation of political ads BumRushDaShow Jul 3 #59
Pre-November, a lot of people didn't see the economy as being so great, and it wasn't progree Jul 3 #45
LINKS to some BLS Data Series Numbers and Graphs - progree Jul 3 #25
Thank you! The actual jobs numbers can be very confusing, thanx again n/t Cheezoholic Jul 3 #42
And thank you, I appreciate that. It's all quite quite confusing, and baffling /nt progree Jul 3 #46
Yes, the one that gets me (and I believe was mentioned in the OP) is the people that fall off the Unemployment rolls Cheezoholic Jul 3 #66
Something smells fishy Fiendish Thingy Jul 3 #34
The break-even for job growth in the US is around 150,000... Hugin Jul 3 #35
Yesterday's report was from ADP, which reflects only a small slice of the workforce. PSPS Jul 3 #41
Yup, the ADP numbers cover only about 20% of the nation's private workforce. progree Jul 3 #50
If we're going to talk about the ADP Employment Report, we should go to their site to see how they measure things. mahatmakanejeeves Jul 3 #44
I remember 200k as being the minimum new jobs JanMichael Jul 3 #47
Maddow Blog-New U.S. job numbers show 2025 is off to a discouragingly sluggish start LetMyPeopleVote Jul 3 #48
Hmmm, darn, that's right. Lowest January-June job growth since 2010 except for 2020 pandemic year progree Jul 3 #55
Yet ADP says otherwise Owens Jul 3 #51
Am I missing something here. republianmushroom Jul 3 #52
"Cook the Books" ZDU Jul 3 #54
Even Bloomberg is calling bs electricmonk Jul 3 #57
I found it - progree Jul 3 #63
Thanks for the additional info n/t electricmonk Jul 3 #65
So they hired back people they fired Tree Lady Jul 3 #58
Both BLS And ADP Have Issues But ADP Has More Issues DallasNE Jul 4 #68
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. payrolls increased b...»Reply #25