Here's what you said:
You can criticize the overwhelming Nazi bent to precedent being set by the Dancing Supremes AND you can fight. The 2 are not mutually exclusive.
++To actually make that assertion, what you'd have to do is first define "Nazi." Second, after you have that definition, you'd have to go through all the court decisions and classify them according to your definition of Nazi. If you come up with a majority, that's still not good enough. It has to be an overwhelming majority to characterize an entire set of judgments from one court as bending to a particular definition.
Hey, go ahead. Have at it. If you're not up for the challenge, I suggest you temper your broad, sweeping statements because there are a lot of people here who just might buy into it.
All I'm telling you is the what I used to have to tell writers of theses and dissertations whether their characterizations of a situation were going to fly in the face of a board of critics.
----------
As to your other statement: AND you can fight.
++Sure you can as a demoralized "soldier." Just ask Putin how he does it.