Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

onenote

(45,598 posts)

3. They didn't rule on a petition for cert. They denied a stay request. Meaning at least five opposed granting the stay.

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Reply #2)

Wed Jul 9, 2025, 07:20 PM

Jul 9

Interestingly, Thomas could have granted the stay unilaterally and not referred it to the court. That he didn't and that there are no dissents noted indicates that this was unanimous.

Denials of stay request typically are not accompanied by opinions.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court won't let Florida enforce controversial immigration law [View all] BumRushDaShow Jul 9 OP

We need to scream as loudly about this unsigned opinion, JMCKUSICK Jul 9 #1

Well what is ironic BumRushDaShow Jul 9 #2

They didn't rule on a petition for cert. They denied a stay request. Meaning at least five opposed granting the stay. onenote Jul 9 #3

Which is ironic. BumRushDaShow Jul 9 #4

More background. onenote Jul 9 #5

Which is ironic BumRushDaShow Jul 9 #6