Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

ancianita

(41,348 posts)

4. I think it's the appellate courts that decide on whether rules of procedure have been followed. It's not outside

Reply to TomSlick (Reply #3)

Wed Jul 16, 2025, 08:03 PM

Jul 16

the bounds of this MAGA SS for Kavanaugh to second guess this appellate court as a setup for SCOTUS to overrule it, as they've done with other appeals courts and state supreme courts, as I recall.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court justice pauses ruling weakening Voting Rights Act [View all] BumRushDaShow Jul 16 OP

So what does Kavanaugh's "pause" on an appeals court ruling actually tell us. ancianita Jul 16 #1

That the DOJ can force texas to redistrict? SSJVegeta Jul 16 #2

My initial thought was that he was following the law and rules of procedure. TomSlick Jul 16 #3

I think it's the appellate courts that decide on whether rules of procedure have been followed. It's not outside ancianita Jul 16 #4

But the appellate court ruled that individuals lack standing to challenge claimed violations of the VRA. Igel Jul 17 #5

I'll take your considered word for it. I just thought that the original court decided standing, and that the appellate ancianita Jul 17 #6