Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(4,127 posts)

2. Thomas might, but not the majority on the SC, because it would open the door that states can violate the

Wed Jul 23, 2025, 09:23 PM

Jul 23

Constitution.

What the SC will probably do though is take the case and delay the ruling, even perhaps lifting the injunction until they rule on it.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump's birthright citizenship order is unconstitutional, appeals court says [View all] tulipsandroses Jul 23 OP

On to SCOTUS. We know that Clarence will vote in favor of Trump. OrlandoDem2 Jul 23 #1

formal citizenship on a per state basis would mean BadgerKid Jul 24 #5

8 - 1 Curtailing birthright citizenship is unconstitutional. speak easy Jul 23 #4

Locking LBN dupe. Lasher Jul 24 #6

It didn't get locked /nt progree Jul 24 #7