Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JohnnyRingo

(20,268 posts)
2. As an AV buff I enjoyed the story at the link.
Thu Sep 18, 2025, 09:05 AM
Sep 18

There was one mistake though. It indicted that the US insisted on daytime bombing raids as if it was a matter of incompetence.
In reality we flew the day raids and the Brits flew night missions. This made it easier to coordinate missions and kept Germany under constant 24 hour bombardment.

The Flying Fortress was indeed heavily armed but it's real defense was altitude. Unlike the British bombers we bombed from up to 30,000 feet, making it more difficult for fighter planes to intercept. There was no radar at the beginning of WWII so they had to see the contrails, scramble, and hope they can climb that high before the bombers were done. Unfortunately flying such an altitude meant a lighter bomb load, usually no more than 2,000 lbs. The British Lancasters at low level, could carry 15,000+ pounds. The trade off was that it was difficult to hit a target in a blacked out city, even at low altitude. Night fighters were the bane of the RAF, especially with the advent of radar.

Good article. Thanx for posting.

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

John Clouds Passing Sep 18 #1
As an AV buff I enjoyed the story at the link. JohnnyRingo Sep 18 #2
Mr. Luckadoo, Sir, RIP republianmushroom Sep 18 #3
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»John H. Luckadoo, Last Pi...»Reply #2