(and I saw one stat recently regarding tariffs where supposedly over 1000 business alone filed suit against that), "JustSecurity" has a tracker of 572 cases related to 45's crap here - https://www.justsecurity.org/107087/tracker-litigation-legal-challenges-trump-administration/
HOWEVER - a clearer picture of a status where he is determined to pursue all avenues, comes from the SCOTUS "shadow docket" stats, a tracker that can be found here - Supreme Court Shadow Docket Tracker Challenges to Trump Administration Actions
Per the above link, as of Dec. 23, 2025 -
Since January 20, 2025, the Supreme Court has issued 25 decisions on the shadow docket concerning administration actions.
20 ruled for the administration at least partially
5 ruled against the administration
7 were not accompanied by any written explanation (most other rulings included only brief analysis, sometimes as short as a sentence
Two shadow docket applications are currently pending.
I expect a number of those were filed after violating lower court orders where he went running to "Daddy Roberts".
Not all of the cases were run up to the "shadow docket" though (which suggests backing off - at least temporarily).
The WORST of the unreported violations would be related to the immigration and deportation issue, where I expect there are tens of thousands of violations (if you count single individuals) and this is why a number of immigrant groups and the ACLU, etc., have/had filed to have those impacted, considered a "class" for a "class action" suit (which would drop the number of "individual" cases).
The SECOND WORST would probably be First Amendment violations (again with organizations later filing for and obtaining "class action" status for this - e.g., protestors involved in the Palestinian issue, the Charlie Kirk issue, the immigration issue, and now more recently the National Guard presence and ICE issues, as well as the book bans, DEI purges, etc.).
The THIRD WORST would probably deal with the recent "funding cuts" for illegal, bogus, and nonsensical reasons, where in a number of cases, the funding was eventually restored after lower court hand-slaps.
The FOURTH WORST might relate to all those DOGeshit cuts (including fed firings and then re-hirings and then re-firings, etc, as well as the removals of heads of independent agencies - with some left alone but others booted pending resolutions of lower court cases and/or the SCOTUS).
So in the scheme of all the cases (and potential cases) out there, and based on all the LBN OPs I have done on the "intransigent" cases that "made the news" (like the Abrego Garcia case and more recently, the targeting of Comey and James), where judges have been threatening sanctions, there are so far only a "handful" of continued violations in the scheme of the thousands of cases (so far). In most cases, they backed down (like finally removing out-of-state NG from California and Oregon, etc).