Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,454 posts)
13. Not all "lies" are false.
Thu Jan 15, 2026, 11:48 PM
Jan 15

Some lies are mostly true and are false by omission.

The speaker says only true, the hearer infers all false.

This is worse than a lie. With a lie, you can say, "He told me an untruth." With an inferred untruth based on truth, you might claim you were mislead--but that means you were duped, and even then, for a superior0-thinking person that means the stupid mislead the bright. The person heard the facts, the person inferred wrongly, reached a false conclusion ... and owns it. That person didn't just accept it--it's that person's own conclusion, fruit of his/her labor. It's their intellectual baby and they've bought in.

Ownership is hard to give up.

Even if it's built on a set of true facts that omits a lot of also true facts so sets the I-wanna-believe thinker, often self-dubbed "critical" thinker, up for naive thinking and false conclusions. If logic has it's own devil appointed to corrupt it, it's that devil's work.

I've said before that "half a lie is worse than a lie" because that's how it works. In academia. In relationships. In politics.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Renee Good's family hires...»Reply #13