Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(105,883 posts)
6. Yeah, that reads like the first stage of a cover-up, not a "full investigation"
Sun Jan 25, 2026, 02:07 PM
Jan 25

It starts by putting all the blame on named political enemies of the NRA, despite Walz not being involved, and lying that he "incites violence". It talks about "law enforcement officers" (the problem here is these officers are breaking the law, in all kinds of ways) "simply trying to do their jobs" ("I was only obeying orders" is no excuse or defence). Note the passive "have ended in violence", without noting the violence was committed by the federal authorities.

Then we use the weasel-word (OK, phrase) "officer-involved shooting", as if it's unclear who shot, and who was killed. "There will be a robust and comprehensive investigation" - this is not a call for an independent investigation, just an assumption that there will be a "comprehensive" one. They talk about whether "force" (this was not just "force" - "force" was the federal officer pushing the woman to the ground. This was "lethal force", ie killing was justified). They again blame "political voices", rather than the federal organisation that just killed someone.

This is just a careful restatement of the Trump position, with moderate language rather than unhinged accusations.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The NRA assumes there will be an investigation Soul_of_Wit Jan 25 #1
Too late for any real, trustworthy investigation. ICE/Noem/Bondi already botched any chance via evidence handling Attilatheblond Jan 25 #2
Let's not go & throw any parades for the NRA just yet... Earth Bound Misfit Jan 25 #3
Exactly, they're simply looking out for the interests of manufacturers of these deadly weapons. groundloop Jan 25 #4
The NRA told the GOVERNOR Of A State he should have no role in law enforcement delisen Jan 25 #5
Yeah, that reads like the first stage of a cover-up, not a "full investigation" muriel_volestrangler Jan 25 #6
The NRA is only getting concerned because the murdered man was carrying a legal concealed weapon. patphil Jan 25 #7
I'll take this ... IF true. stopdiggin Jan 25 #8
Where I grew up they would call this "fuckin' bullshit". twodogsbarking Jan 25 #9
Icesickles in hell orangecrush Jan 25 #10
I'm really glad they are standing up for this. NH Ethylene Jan 25 #11
They are not quakerboy Jan 25 #12
But for many NRA members, this is a real conundrum. intheflow Jan 26 #17
if the nra actually listened too or cared about its members quakerboy Jan 26 #18
Fuck Bill Essayli too IcyPeas Jan 25 #13
The NRA only cares about MAGA and Republican's guns. hadEnuf Jan 25 #14
Yet , it is always the autocrat that takes their guns. travelingthrulife Jan 26 #20
Well, at least they are sticking to principles. I accept any help to force ICE to stand down. Martin68 Jan 25 #15
I can see why they're pissed jmowreader Jan 26 #16
Protecting the 'precious, holy gun.' travelingthrulife Jan 26 #19
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»NRA and pro-gun groups ca...»Reply #6