Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(68,874 posts)
5. More from the article:
Wed Jan 28, 2026, 10:51 AM
Jan 28
The DOE was uniquely positioned to offer a speedy pathway to approval. The nation's commercial nuclear reactors are typically under the regulatory oversight of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Hanson says the NRC is independent and known for its rigor and public process. ... But since the NRC began its work in 1975, the Energy Department has retained the ability to regulate its own reactors, which have historically been used for research and nuclear weapons-related activities.

The rules governing DOE reactors are a mix of federal regulations and directives known as "orders." Changes to federal regulations require public notice and comment, but DOE's orders can be legally changed internally with no public comment period. The orders have historically been made public via a DOE database.

Until now, the DOE's rules have typically applied to just a handful of reactors located on government property. The Reactor Pilot Program expands that regulatory authority to all reactors built as part of the program. Officials explained to the crowd in the June meeting that this includes DOE-contracted reactors built outside of the department's national laboratories.

And while broadening its oversight, officials said, safety personnel located primarily at Idaho National Laboratory would also rewrite the DOE's orders for these reactors.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This maladminstration is worse than Wrongway Feldon UpInArms Jan 28 #1
Well that's a disturbing headline kerouac2 Jan 28 #2
No way will that hold in court angrychair Jan 28 #3
More from the article: mahatmakanejeeves Jan 28 #5
Seems obvious, right? yellow dahlia Jan 28 #15
I posted about this in GD to highlight that this was done as a favor for the AI bros: highplainsdem Jan 28 #4
A nation is not just real estate... GiqueCee Jan 28 #6
He gets off on gore and death. yellow dahlia Jan 28 #16
Dump: Who cares about nuclear safety anyway? sakabatou Jan 28 #7
It would be interesting if people were as concerned with fossil fuel exposures... NNadir Jan 28 #8
That's comforting Bayard Jan 28 #9
It will be fossil fuels that destroy the natural world as we know it and kill billions of people. hunter Jan 28 #10
What about the nuclear plant construction costs and the waste fuel. DougBee Jan 28 #11
Welcome to DU ! KS Toronado Jan 28 #12
Integrating solar and wind power into a reliable electric grid is expensive. hunter Jan 28 #13
Why do I keep reading and hearing KS Toronado Jan 29 #19
It's an accounting trick. Or a damnable lie. hunter Jan 29 #21
Welcome to DU LetMyPeopleVote Jan 29 #20
A VERY big deal. Expect another lawsuit that the regime will lose. pat_k Jan 28 #14
Such a big deal - for many reasons. yellow dahlia Jan 28 #18
You say, "Paperwork." I hear, "Profit." Kid Berwyn Jan 28 #17
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»The Trump administration ...»Reply #5