Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AnnaLee

(1,362 posts)
18. If the documents they see were converted to digital form
Fri Feb 6, 2026, 05:58 PM
Friday

If the documents, even if currently not editable, were ever in digital editable form, they have had enough time to replace names of the President's friends with other names, including assigning the Clinton's names to events they weren't even around for. Also, for visuals, if you can't have the documents for visuals that aren't in the redacted copies, how does anyone know if they are photoshopped or not? Not even better than nothing in my opinion. Every redacted spot is at the DOJ's replacement.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So will any GQPees take a gander or nah Leghorn21 Friday #1
Hopefully one or two of the Dems have photographic memories.... TheRickles Friday #2
or Pornographic memories LiberalArkie Friday #16
The article says they may take notes NoRethugFriends Friday #19
what? Maxheader Friday #3
How the hell does anyone review three million files? How was the indexing done? hunter Friday #4
One does not. drray23 Friday #6
Yeah staff would be able to tear through these. underpants Friday #9
Of course not. drray23 Friday #12
We're still in the bury them with bullshit phase of this administration's defense. hunter Friday #11
If true, this will be less than half of what they've been hiding PSPS Friday #5
Face the camera for an ID check, please. usonian Friday #7
Nevertheless, there WILL be leaks! FakeNoose Friday #20
Can they then report what they find from viewing the files? hamsterjill Friday #8
How many of them will start by searching for themselves, their big donors and their enemies? (nt) William Seger Friday #10
Exactly my thoughts. Hope I'm clean. chicoescuela Friday #26
They can ony view the docs electronically? intheflow Friday #13
Once more into the breach! IMO those will only cover benign issues like parking tickets in Manhattan. They will skirt Ford_Prefect Friday #14
Such BS. ALL files were ordered to be released in DECEMBER. ALL files. This is Khabuki theatre. Evolve Dammit Friday #15
Confused here. Did the judges order say only release to members of congress bluestarone Friday #17
The law allows for some redactions Wiz Imp Friday #28
If the documents they see were converted to digital form AnnaLee Friday #18
This message was self-deleted by its author Wiz Imp Friday #29
Get ready for the leaks ... probably starting next week FakeNoose Friday #21
Not good enough pfitz59 Friday #22
good work being done on reddit oldtime dfl_er Friday #23
Members of Congress will be able to view unredacted Epstein files next week AverageOldGuy Friday #24
Don't question this - accept it FakeNoose Friday #25
Maybe Aaron Parnas and Ben Meiseles could tell them which pages to look at since they've fierywoman Friday #27
Some Democrats need to take notes of as many illegal redactions as they can. Wiz Imp Friday #30
If their phones have cameras, and they are allowed to bring those phones with them hopefully they will take pictures. lostincalifornia Friday #31
From the article: "They may take notes, but cannot bring in any electronic devices, the letter said" Wiz Imp 19 hrs ago #32
Take snapshots with an old camera. Non electronic Iwasthere 16 hrs ago #33
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Members of Congress will ...»Reply #18