Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Aussie105

(7,732 posts)
9. It was (is?) a boy's club.
Mon Feb 9, 2026, 06:43 PM
Monday

When a bunch of guys get together it is easy for them to collectively come to think that the common guidelines of morality and law are optional, that they can set their own rules in isolation from the rest of the world.

People - us commoners - really want to know who was in this particular pedophile boys' club.

Someone who reads the unredacted files needs to stand up and read out the names.
In a place where they cannot be silenced.
Without fear or favor for the current status of those people.

And that demoted British prince shouldn't be off the hook, either.
The British have a long history of turning a blind eye to the misbehavior of bored royal males.
Given proof of his involvement, he should at the very least be on a watchlist and be arrested if he sets foot on American soil.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Lets just say it out straight... FarPoint Monday #1
It is now the DOI (Department Of Injustice). Justice matters. Tuesday #17
That was always completely obvious. Wiz Imp Monday #2
Apparently they won't let them out of the room with the unredacted docs BumRushDaShow Monday #3
The info that was released over the weekend said that they could take notes. Wiz Imp Monday #4
Then I expect he might give it the old "Constitutional law professor" try BumRushDaShow Monday #6
That's what I want to see some Democrats do. Wiz Imp Monday #8
You'd have to be a regular CSPAN junky to catch them on the House floor BumRushDaShow Monday #10
House floor, Hearings - whatever it takes to expose them and put them on the spot is fine with me! Wiz Imp Monday #11
I remember, and it had to have been almost 40 years ago BumRushDaShow Monday #12
I have nothing to back this up, except 68 years of watching politics. mjvpi Monday #5
There's no damn pee tape durablend Monday #13
I fear you're right RainCaster Monday #15
The sexual perversion... returnee Tuesday #20
Trump has changed the G O P so much MW67 Monday #7
It was (is?) a boy's club. Aussie105 Monday #9
"It's all just Locker Room" talk Pluvious Tuesday #27
Melanie Stansbury speaks truth Clouds Passing Monday #14
Text from the Reddit post with the Video... Pluvious Tuesday #28
Thank you, Pluvious ❤️ I thought the video and all would post, not only the link. Clouds Passing Tuesday #29
I Have Read That There Is A Thumb Drive DallasNE Monday #16
PREACH IT, BROTHER JAMIE Skittles Tuesday #18
"no way you run a billion-dollar international child sex trafficking ring with just two people" Botany Tuesday #19
Raskin said unredacted Epstein files indicate DOJ improperly shielded names ironman99 Tuesday #21
Those victims were more than just victims they were Donny's friends. Botany Tuesday #22
'Friends'...I don't typically blackmail my friends travelingthrulife Tuesday #25
Comon Anonymous do your thing! BradBo Tuesday #23
Can we arrest Bondi and Tawd now? travelingthrulife Tuesday #24
No one expected sex criminal Trump to be a 'smart' criminal C_U_L8R Tuesday #26
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Raskin said unredacted Ep...»Reply #9