Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: U.S. payrolls rose by 130,000 in January, more than expected; unemployment rate at 4.3% [View all]progree
(12,837 posts)25. Previous 2 months were revised down by a combined 17,000
https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for November was revised down by 15,000, from +56,000 to +41,000, and the change for December was revised down by 2,000, from +50,000 to
+48,000. With these revisions, employment in November and December combined is 17,000 lower
than previously reported. (Monthly revisions result from additional reports received from
businesses and government agencies since the last published estimates and from the
recalculation of seasonal factors. The annual benchmark process also contributed to the
November and December revisions.)
+48,000. With these revisions, employment in November and December combined is 17,000 lower
than previously reported. (Monthly revisions result from additional reports received from
businesses and government agencies since the last published estimates and from the
recalculation of seasonal factors. The annual benchmark process also contributed to the
November and December revisions.)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
U.S. payrolls rose by 130,000 in January, more than expected; unemployment rate at 4.3% [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Wednesday
OP
The copy/paste text version doesn't run it into the tag like the Xitter post
BumRushDaShow
Wednesday
#4
It's not normally required as a DNS would usually have different variations to refer back to
BumRushDaShow
Wednesday
#14
They are using a wildcard certificate for encryption instead of using a proper server name
Tim S
Wednesday
#7
I can't trust BLS info with Trump and Vought in control. Are they being diddled?
CousinIT
Wednesday
#6
Exactly. Previous BLS Admin was fired for allowing unfavorable numbers to be published......
groundloop
Wednesday
#8
BLS data continues to be legit. As 30+ year employee on the CES program I can vouch for that.
Wiz Imp
Wednesday
#15
It's a sample based estimate. As such it is subject to several types of statistical error.
Wiz Imp
Wednesday
#24
That's really hard to predict. But given Trump's complete lack of understanding
Wiz Imp
Wednesday
#30
and like all the other jobs number, it will quietly be revised down in a month or two. nt
Javaman
Wednesday
#16
And the jobs numbers for 2025 were revised to LESS THAN HALF of what was originally stated.
SunSeeker
Wednesday
#31
MaddowBlog-New report shows 2025 was even worse for U.S. job market than we thought
LetMyPeopleVote
Wednesday
#32
"Reducing trust in government in general is very bad for progressive causes and ultimately great for the populist right.
mahatmakanejeeves
Wednesday
#33
Reality: 800,000+ layoffs this year -- the worst YTD since 2020, per nonpartisan analysts.
LetMyPeopleVote
Wednesday
#35
"The Employment Cost Index shows continued deceleration in compensation growth in Q4."
mahatmakanejeeves
Thursday
#39