Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lostnfound

(17,466 posts)
58. Those are good, constructive ideas. In NC, though, the GOP just grabbed election processes for themselves...
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 09:44 AM
Friday

We are stuck playing whack-a-mole against a well-funded GOP intent on undermining democracy no matter what it takes….instead of having a legitimate opposing party with whom to compromise, collaborate or co-create solutions. (Ha! Laughable, isn’t it?)

The previous North Carolina Democratic governor Roy Cooper had stopped an attempt by the red legislature to steal authority for elections for themselves. A court ruling agreed that it needed to stay in the executive branch.

So the GOP changed tactics, and passed a law to put elections in the hands of the state auditor, also republican, but in the executive branch. https://www.courthousenews.com/north-carolina-governor-continues-fight-for-control-of-elections-boards/

After a separate panel of North Carolina Court of Appeals judges stayed the lower court’s ruling and allowed the auditor to gain control over appointments until the appeal is resolved or the court issues another decision, Boliek promptly flipped the majority on the state board of elections from Democratic to Republican and replaced the board’s executive director with the former general counsel for the speaker of the house.

In addition to the state board of elections, Boliek also gained the ability to appoint members to county election boards, and choose the board chair. Prior to the change, the governor had appointed members to the state board since 1901.

The state GOP has tried several times since 2016 to secure control over the state board of elections, which operates voting sites, maintains voter registration lists and handles election administration


So, if they are required to purge every 30 days by the SAVE act, and also required to hand over lists to the federal government by the SAVE act, and maintenance of those lists is in the hands of a GOP operator, it will be challenging to garner enough resources to fight the ‘glitches’ that will delete hundreds of thousands from the voter rolls for lame reasons.

North Carolina already had 100,000 people that the GOP tried to disenfranchise based in large part on nonsense, it has taken many months to partial resolve.

The actions by the Republican state auditor (or by the federal government who may inject themselves in this process) won’t need to be defensible; they just need to have a temporary effect that can’t be remedied in 30 days.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The GOP has 53 members and (D)s/(I)s have 47 BumRushDaShow Feb 17 #1
Fetterman - pro, Murkowski - no BaronChocula Feb 17 #8
Am hoping it is DOA in the Senate BumRushDaShow Feb 18 #14
Fetterman has not said he supports it. Wiz Imp Feb 18 #20
Jesus Christ, when so many Democrats are against this, Fetterman should NOT even bluestarone Feb 18 #34
Filibusters can be initiated by a simple email to the clerk stating the intention to filibuster Fiendish Thingy Feb 17 #2
"This will be the ultimate test of Schumer's leadership." OldBaldy1701E Feb 17 #3
What if. after the midterms, the Senate is split 51 D/49R onenote Feb 17 #5
Tell me, what legislation is going to be passed with the filibuster intact? Fiendish Thingy Feb 17 #7
So you'd hand control over the Senate back to the repubs onenote Feb 18 #9
It would be Fetterman handing control to the republicans Fiendish Thingy Feb 18 #10
Here is a tracker/scorer for how progressive/conservative our members of Congress are BumRushDaShow Feb 18 #16
Fetterman might be a lot of things, but showboater isn't one of them Deminpenn Feb 18 #19
"Fetterman might be a lot of things, but showboater isn't one of them" BumRushDaShow Feb 18 #30
Fetterman has dressed like that for years Deminpenn Feb 18 #40
Oh I know BumRushDaShow Feb 18 #42
Casey has said he was not retiring and thus has not ruled out running again. Wiz Imp Feb 18 #47
Oh I know like Sherrod Brown BumRushDaShow Feb 18 #49
I was very surprised he lost to McCormick, tbh Deminpenn Thursday #54
Casey and Brown got caught up in a "wave" election BumRushDaShow Thursday #55
Seen the video and posted same several times Deminpenn Thursday #53
Thanks Fiendish Thingy Feb 18 #22
Thanks. Wiz Imp Feb 18 #24
Agree!!! nm mikewv Feb 18 #27
That is because Fetterman made himself into a "media sensation" BumRushDaShow Feb 18 #31
I believe for tie-breaking it matters how Fetterman votes, not what party he's a member of? Ilikepurple Feb 18 #11
For deciding who is the majority leader, it matters a lot. onenote Feb 18 #43
Fetterman would never caucus with Republicans Wiz Imp Feb 18 #46
If he was ousted from the Democratic caucus and stripped of committee positions onenote Feb 18 #50
If the SAVE Act passed the Senate, it would mean at least 8 Democrats voted for it. Wiz Imp Feb 18 #21
Unless, as threatened, they change the rules in the filibuster. Nt Fiendish Thingy Feb 18 #23
If they change the rules eliminating the filibuster, then ZERO Democratic votes are needed to Wiz Imp Feb 18 #25
Unless more republicans than Murkowski vote No. nt Fiendish Thingy Feb 18 #26
The title of the Post and the article it refers to is "Trump's election bill tops 50 Senate votes" Wiz Imp Feb 18 #28
You apparently missed this: Wiz Imp Feb 18 #29
They aren't talking about eliminating it, but changing the rules Fiendish Thingy Feb 18 #41
SO? Let them do it. It will fail and make them look like idiots. Wiz Imp Feb 18 #44
best of luck to them Fiendish Thingy Feb 18 #48
If it is 51/49, Removing Fetterman by any means does not make Vance a tie breaker karynnj Feb 18 #33
"Shapiro would call for a special election. So, he would remain at 50/49 for months. " BumRushDaShow Feb 18 #36
Thanks for the correction. karynnj Feb 18 #37
No problem - I remember that whole period when Heinz had the plane/helicopter accident BumRushDaShow Feb 18 #39
Not talking about removing him from the Senate--talking about removing him from the Democratic caucus onenote Feb 18 #51
Oh, you are correct. Pushing him out of the caucus is beyond stupid karynnj Feb 18 #52
There is ZERO chance of it passing. Wiz Imp Feb 17 #4
I recall election night 2016 . . . AverageOldGuy Feb 17 #6
This isn't the same situation Karma13612 Feb 18 #12
Ridiculous comparison Wiz Imp Feb 18 #18
Lots of good info here, but not a ZERO (all capitals?) chance of passing. Ilikepurple Feb 18 #13
Behind-the-scenes no_hypocrisy Feb 18 #15
I hope Democratic think tanks are working on ways to help people get legitimate IDs if needed. karynnj Feb 18 #35
People who move? College students missing their birth certificate? Hispanics with multiple last names? lostnfound Feb 18 #45
I was not saying that it would easy to create a workable process, karynnj Thursday #57
Those are good, constructive ideas. In NC, though, the GOP just grabbed election processes for themselves... lostnfound Friday #58
Republicans...destroying our democracy one pillar at a time. travelingthrulife Feb 18 #17
So none of these apparently uneducated Senators knows that this is an illegal poll tax? travelingthrulife Feb 18 #32
"So none of these apparently uneducated Senators knows that this is an illegal poll tax?" BumRushDaShow Feb 18 #38
Nor would their wives be exempt if this were to pass. ProudMNDemocrat Thursday #56
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump's election bill top...»Reply #58