Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(28,356 posts)

1. They should only be able to recover actual losses when weighed against what their profits were.

Mon Feb 23, 2026, 05:19 PM

Yesterday

In other words if they raised prices and made the same amount or more profit than they did last year percentage-wise then they should get zilch.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Lawyer in SCOTUS case against Trump's tariffs says his clients want a refund [View all] BumRushDaShow Yesterday OP

the tarrif expense should be passed on RainCaster Yesterday #2

That's essentially what I an saying. cstanleytech Yesterday #5

How about consumers' grocery bills? bucolic_frolic Yesterday #3

"I saw a columm from Barron's yesterday which I can't find now" BumRushDaShow Yesterday #8

That looks like it. To me it looks like they doc03 21 hrs ago #9

Yeah they seem to do the shell game of focusing on the "DEFICIT" BumRushDaShow 15 hrs ago #11

Take away ICE's budget Bayard 17 hrs ago #10