Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(168,392 posts)
Tue Mar 3, 2026, 02:56 PM Yesterday

US considering military support for Middle East oil and gas supplies [View all]

Source: Politico

03/03/2026 01:32 PM EST


The Trump administration is considering providing military protection to oil and gas tankers traversing the Strait of Hormuz in a bid to cool energy prices that have surged since Iran warned it would attack ships at the choke point, two people said Tuesday.

“Military support for oil and gas supplies,” a person familiar with the discussion who was granted anonymity to discuss internal conversations said when asked about the potential for U.S. naval vessels to escort ships traveling through the strait. “It’s becoming a growing concern that the energy markets could face pressures in the coming days as the military campaign intensifies and expands in geographic scope. Access to the Straits of Hormuz is obviously vital for both natural gas and crude oil shipments, especially from Qatar and Saudi.”

U.S. oil prices have risen nearly $10 per barrel since the end of last week as the fighting has continued. That increase has started to filter down to gasoline prices, which are poised to climb higher than when President Donald Trump took office last year.

The administration is also considering potentially having the U.S. government back the insurance needed for tankers to continue traveling through the strait, said a third person familiar with the discussions. While the strait remains technically open, marine insurance companies are hiking rates and in some cases canceling coverage for tankers that traverse the area.

Read more: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/03/iran-oil-energy-military-trump-hormuz-00808825



WTAF????

There are "Live Updates" breaking about this ridiculous scenario right now.

“Military support for oil and gas supplies,” a person familiar with the discussion who was granted anonymity to discuss internal conversations said when asked about the potential for U.S. naval vessels to escort ships traveling through the strait.

(snip)

The administration is also considering potentially having the U.S. government back the insurance needed for tankers to continue traveling through the strait, said a third person familiar with the discussions.


Where is the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ for this? Why not ask Muskrat to kick in a couple hundred million.
58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bet ya the oil Traildogbob Yesterday #1
Crazy! ruet Yesterday #2
China... Justice matters. 19 hrs ago #38
So, we are going to endanger US lives Miguelito Loveless Yesterday #3
Yeah... who will want to risk their life working on those tankers? nt Justice matters. 19 hrs ago #39
So how about calling the whole goddamn thing off Klarkashton Yesterday #4
Snip from BBC nitpicked Yesterday #5
They can't get Americans out but guard the oil. Srkdqltr 22 hrs ago #26
Seems like a sensible consideration to me, help tamper down the oil market jitters EX500rider Yesterday #6
There are too many tankers and cargo ships stuck in the Strait right now BumRushDaShow Yesterday #8
Might be other navies will to help with that, their economies depend on it EX500rider Yesterday #10
There are a bunch of countries who have been against our actions against Iran BumRushDaShow Yesterday #15
How willing they are or not will change if they run out of oil due to the Iranians stopping tanker traffic EX500rider 23 hrs ago #20
China has already been obfuscating their ships to get what they need BumRushDaShow 23 hrs ago #21
FUCK yes....what an absolute clown show, ran by the head clown himself democratsruletheday 21 hrs ago #29
I keep seeing images of the maritime situation at the moment BumRushDaShow 21 hrs ago #31
It is not sensible sarisataka Yesterday #11
"the Iranians could overwhelm a ship with a swarm attack" - EXACTLY!!!!!!!! BumRushDaShow Yesterday #17
Once the Iranian's lose total air control Predators overhead firing on any anti-vessel activity will slow that down fast EX500rider 23 hrs ago #22
Recall how difficult it was to find Hussein's SCUD launchers sarisataka 23 hrs ago #23
Both aerial surveillance & the kill chain speed are vastly different now then in 1991 though EX500rider 20 hrs ago #35
Don't forget the people who 45 keeps claiming were "obliterated" (the Houthis) BumRushDaShow 22 hrs ago #28
Yeah but they get all their weapons from Iran who I doubt has any to spare now EX500rider 20 hrs ago #34
Remember who has helped Iran ramp up production BumRushDaShow 11 hrs ago #42
I doubt the Russians have any to spare for the houthis either EX500rider 8 hrs ago #44
They have their own production that can be distributed BumRushDaShow 8 hrs ago #45
Yes the Russians have their own production facility for Shahed drones EX500rider 3 hrs ago #47
They don't necessarily need them all for Ukraine BumRushDaShow 3 hrs ago #48
Not a chance, Egypt is losing billions a year due to Houthi strikes on vessels EX500rider 3 hrs ago #49
I'm not necessarily talking about Egypt BumRushDaShow 2 hrs ago #50
No sane Egyptian is helping by smuggling anti-ship assets across Egypt for Russia EX500rider 2 hrs ago #51
Stop fixating on "Egypt" BumRushDaShow 2 hrs ago #54
Yes currently in CULTURALLY ARAB countries the Houthis are unpopular EX500rider 1 hr ago #55
Doesn't even matter which nationality or politically-affiliated group BumRushDaShow 1 hr ago #56
Undoubtedly they're low on weapons EX500rider 1 hr ago #57
They don't need that many to cause havoc in Israel BumRushDaShow 1 hr ago #58
Oil immediately crashed nitpicked Yesterday #13
It's generally been trading in the $70 - $75 range for the past week BumRushDaShow Yesterday #18
What about oil in the Gulf of Tonkin? Is the USS Maine available? underpants Yesterday #7
We did the same thing during the Tanker War phase sarisataka Yesterday #9
But there is ANOTHER HUGE DIFFERENCE BumRushDaShow Yesterday #12
We never said we would guarantee the money part before questionseverything 2 hrs ago #53
little child rapist Whip-poor-will Yesterday #14
Socialize the costs, privatize the profits Brother Buzz Yesterday #16
What better time to start moving away from oil all together? OC375 Yesterday #19
In less than 200 years,oilmen have created a colossal mess delisen 8 hrs ago #46
GOP Grand Oil Party Emile 22 hrs ago #24
Ground troops were deployed to Vietnam merely to protect the airfields, don't forget Prairie Gates 22 hrs ago #25
We've entered the " Way Back Machine for Wars " .....we're re-living Bread and Circuses 22 hrs ago #27
"Why not ask Muskrat to kick in a couple hundred million." Polybius 21 hrs ago #30
Not "ironic" BumRushDaShow 21 hrs ago #32
I get what you're saying, but I don't want and EV head to be forced to pay specifically for oil Polybius 19 hrs ago #36
It might not just be "for oil" either BumRushDaShow 11 hrs ago #43
but FUCK YOU if you want affordable health insurance Skittles 21 hrs ago #33
Yes. Where's the $$ for this? And was it part of the "plan?" Grins 19 hrs ago #37
Probably just occurred to Trump that midterms might not Jarqui 18 hrs ago #40
Gas was up to $5.49 a gallon yesterday CountAllVotes 2 hrs ago #52
Happened on this youtube video... NowsTheTime 15 hrs ago #41
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US considering military s...