Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ancianita

(43,284 posts)
23. Easy to say in 20-20 hindsight.
Thu Mar 12, 2026, 11:55 AM
Thursday

The U.S. Constitution's writers weren't perfect, but they 'constituted' the best version of a democratic republic in its day.

They also made it amendable to change, with new historical circumstances. I'd only agree that we're fucked now because we ourselves have not made the time to ratify new amendments. The last amendment to the U.S. Constitution, the 27th Amendment, was ratified on May 7, 1992. Originally proposed in 1789, it prohibits Congress from increasing or decreasing its salary until an election of Representatives has occurred.

After that amendment, nothing.
Not for lack of trying on women's part, though. The ERA languished for reasons mostly men know.

There are other problems with our current constitution that its writers knew about but decided against.
Most important to a nation is that its constitution hold that education be a fundamental constitutional right.
They knew that an educated citizenry was best for a democratic republic -- called a Jeffersonian democracy -- but the Constitution's writers and signers decided to turn education over to the states.
That's what we still have -- 50 different state systems, curricula, capital outlays, and varying taxes levied to pay for it, which makes for a wide 50-state variance of excellence in basic education, and worse, a public that doesn't value systematic education of its descendants. We didn't even have public education in the South until after the Civil War, when blacks in southern state legislatures pressed their states to establish public schools.

We're also fucked because many people who have the ability and desire to go into higher education can't even afford state university educations, nevermind the private universities like the Ivies, U of Chicago or Northwestern. So we're fucked with over 65% of our population undereducated, as in not having at least four years of college.

I've got a lot more to say, but suffice to say we've been fucked over by elites since the nation's funders founded it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

the evils of CAPITALISM and AUTHORITARIANISM would be more relevant to them Skittles Wednesday #1
I have complete confidence that the kids will ignore all the crap they spew. mwb970 Wednesday #2
The Heritage Foundation is communist Puppyjive Wednesday #3
You're joking, right? You think a neo-fascist org like the Heritage Foundation is communist? Seriously? ancianita Wednesday #5
To be fair, though, Florida also requires that students pass a Florida Civic Literacy Exam (FCLE), which covers ancianita Wednesday #4
Enslaved people were counted as three-fifths of a person. Frasier Balzov Wednesday #7
I hear you, though the real problem at the time was to get the U.S. Constitution ratified by a majority of states. ancianita Wednesday #8
Too many compromises Mysterian Thursday #20
Easy to say in 20-20 hindsight. ancianita Thursday #23
Electoral college and non-democratic allotment of senators Mysterian Thursday #24
All that, too, yes. I hear you on the rest. ancianita Thursday #25
Amending the Constitution is about "taking the time"? dpibel Thursday #26
You answered your own question. Yes, it takes time to ratify an amendment. ancianita Thursday #30
Apparently you have missed the point. dpibel Thursday #32
Sure, some amendments got ratified quickly. ancianita Thursday #33
LOL dpibel Thursday #34
FL public school grad -- 3/5 compromise not skipped over cmmngrnd Wednesday #10
I admit my surprise and my error! Frasier Balzov Wednesday #12
We had to take "Americansim vs Communism" in FL during the 70's cmmngrnd Wednesday #6
What a weird course title. It would be more accurately labeled Capitalism vs Communism, both being economic ideologies. ancianita Wednesday #9
Only those looking for conflict would take your post as such. OldBaldy1701E Thursday #18
1967 Orlando grad here The Blue Flower Thursday #27
It might be useful if they teach it along with other systems like socialism, democracy, totalitarianism, and anarchy FakeNoose Wednesday #11
Hopefully it will be as sucessful as Abstince focused sex ed IbogaProject Wednesday #13
The syllabus definitely should include.... reACTIONary Wednesday #14
Textbook written by Joe McCarthy JohnnyRingo Thursday #15
Almost fifty years ago, I had to take "Comparative Political Systems" to graduate high school in FL. eppur_se_muova Thursday #16
It should be a comprehensive class on uncontrolled capitalism as well but it won't. cstanleytech Thursday #17
i would deliberately fail samnsara Thursday #19
makes me think of Religion class in my catholic high school rurallib Thursday #21
I wonder if it's the same class I had to take in FL in 1970? lark Thursday #22
"Americanism???" Grins Thursday #31
This was during the Vietnam war, we were aware it was total bullshit. lark Yesterday #37
and people vote for rethugs because they are upset about "indoctination" Takket Thursday #28
How about an anti-Fascist class; you could call it "Antifa!" Grins Thursday #29
I like that, good title by the way Ranting Randy Thursday #35
One trick ponies. retread Yesterday #36
Many years ago I took an economics class in Poland, before they broke free Ranting Randy Yesterday #38
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»This Fall, Florida Studen...»Reply #23