Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6. I speculated on that in another thread:
Fri Mar 13, 2026, 11:58 AM
Friday
When I was stationed at Nellis AFB in Nevada

We deployed a squadron of F-16s from there to Ramstein AB in Germany. We took sixteen F-16s, divided into groups of 4. We maintainers and the support equipment were loaded onto four KC-10 tankers. The aircraft flew non stop to Germany with our fighters refueling as needed from the tankers. Because of the length of the flight the tankers themselves were refueled several times by other tankers that were staged along the route.

If it wasn't friendly or enemy fire that took that tanker down, what did? Other reporting mentioned that another aircraft was involved in the same incident but that aircraft landed ok. Purely speculation on my part, but my initial thought was "mid-air collision?" I wonder if a fighter attached to the refueling boom contacted the tail and damaged flight control surfaces. Or possibly it was refueling another tanker and they bumped.



edited to add link:

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/us-iran-war-is-that-a-damaged-tail-us-kc-135-tanker-visuals-fuel-midair-collision-buzz-11209071

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

We'll never know the truth, this Administration is incapable of being truthful. dem4decades Friday #1
killed to protect a pedophile Blues Heron Friday #2
Yep. ck4829 Yesterday #25
In the UK, Historian Mark Felton found parts of WWII still classified bucolic_frolic Friday #3
When I was writing my melm00se Friday #16
Maybe if genius MF47 had some bases in Afghanistan this wouldn't have happened Ponietz Friday #4
Mid-air collision AverageOldGuy Friday #5
I speculated on that in another thread: InstantGratification Friday #6
It is almost 100% certain that the collision was with another plane involved in the refueling operation Bluetus Friday #11
Correct, tankers are not normally that close InstantGratification Friday #18
A question about the tanker-on-tanker scenario Bluetus Saturday #22
I could give you wild speculation, not much else InstantGratification Sunday #23
revisiting this InstantGratification 21 hrs ago #26
So it sounds like a "regular" collision Bluetus 19 hrs ago #27
yep InstantGratification 16 hrs ago #28
I appreciate the insights nonetheless Bluetus 1 hr ago #29
It's amazing that the other plane survived. I saw the supposed image of the other plane and it looked pretty good! LeftInTX Friday #8
The number is now 13. Baitball Blogger Friday #7
14 wnylib Friday #10
7 from the first strike in Kuwait and this 6. Baitball Blogger Friday #12
Yes, you missed one, but you are not alone on that. wnylib Friday #13
They did underreport it. Baitball Blogger Friday #14
Everything Trump touches. Initech Friday #9
my granddaughter called her mother sobbing... agingdem Friday #15
There was no way they would have survived RetiredParatrooper Friday #17
A lot of people don't realize in every air war more planes have been lost to accidents than combat JohnnyRingo Friday #19
Sounds like exhausted -pilot error Warpy Friday #20
There are no parachutes on a KC-135 so the plane... S/V Loner Friday #21
... ck4829 Yesterday #24
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»All 6 U.S. crew members k...»Reply #6