Latest Breaking News

BumRushDaShow

(169,629 posts)

13. "if birthright citizenship is revoked, can the reinstitution of slavery still be off limits?"

Sun Mar 29, 2026, 08:18 PM

23 hrs ago

THAT is the problem we are facing.

No one thought they would "touch" Roe. No one thought they would touch the VRA (even with FOUR CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS DEALING WITH VOTING). Next target is the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

It's all up to those 6 fiends.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

sheshe2 thought crime LeftInTX IbogaProject hotellanai1986

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Looking to limit birthright citizenship, Trump turns to an 1884 Supreme Court ruling against a Native American man [View all] BumRushDaShow Yesterday OP

Can't wait to hear the arguments before the court. Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #1

With THIS court? bluestarone Yesterday #3

My guess, 7-2 against. Nt Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #8

I know for sure bluestarone 23 hrs ago #10

Wow, had not seen your response but mine was exactly the same..."With this court?" Escurumbele 12 hrs ago #32

Weak sauce. bucolic_frolic Yesterday #2

Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 nullified Elk v Wilkins Historic NY Yesterday #4

Since the SCOTUS doesn't care about "stare decisis" BumRushDaShow Yesterday #6

But this isn't stare decicis Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #9

Have you forgotten BumRushDaShow 23 hrs ago #11

Haven't forgotten at all Fiendish Thingy 23 hrs ago #12

"if birthright citizenship is revoked, can the reinstitution of slavery still be off limits?" BumRushDaShow 23 hrs ago #13

All the more reason why we must only elect Dem senators willing to kill the filibuster and expand the court Fiendish Thingy 23 hrs ago #15

Roe was focused on enforcement of the PRIVATE right for women to choose what to do with her own body BumRushDaShow 14 hrs ago #30

And that horrific ruling will continue to stand Fiendish Thingy 9 hrs ago #36

That was the hope in 2022 BumRushDaShow 8 hrs ago #37

That's because Biden wanted to wait on the report from the bipartisan commission on court reform Fiendish Thingy 7 hrs ago #42

Not exactly. Ms. Toad 22 hrs ago #17

Birthright citizenship is also a law LeftInTX 21 hrs ago #23

It is the interpretation of the constitution that is at issue. Ms. Toad 21 hrs ago #24

I disagree Fiendish Thingy 20 hrs ago #25

"If the constitution says two term limit for a president, it doesn't mean three" BumRushDaShow 11 hrs ago #33

But the Constitution doesn't say two terms for a p president. Ms. Toad 10 hrs ago #34

Two means two, not three Fiendish Thingy 10 hrs ago #35

Again, you are reducing a paragraph to a single word. Ms. Toad 8 hrs ago #38

At this time, it's probably a moot point Fiendish Thingy 7 hrs ago #43

Except that the US constitution does NOT Farmer-Rick 19 hrs ago #27

Article III of the constitution and Marbury v. Madison. Ms. Toad 8 hrs ago #39

In that Supreme Court ruling Farmer-Rick 7 hrs ago #41

I'll see Elk v. Wilkins, cloudbase Yesterday #5

The funny thing is, Wong Ark was decided in 1898 NickB79 22 hrs ago #18

Trump would have required both parents to be wnylib Yesterday #7

Doesn't seem relevant Renew Deal 23 hrs ago #14

So at that time territories weren't considered "The US"? Callie1979 22 hrs ago #20

That's the way I'm reading it Renew Deal 21 hrs ago #22

I Think They Are Talking About Indian Territories DallasNE 19 hrs ago #28

If thats the story then it would seem to have zero meaning to today's case. Callie1979 13 hrs ago #31

What total bullshit. Another argument of convenience. Scalded Nun 22 hrs ago #16

Sounds like a "3/5ths" argument; seen as lesser individuals. Callie1979 22 hrs ago #19

This case in an interpretation that is consistent with how the provision has always been interpreted. Ms. Toad 21 hrs ago #21

I'm not buying that argument Bayard 20 hrs ago #26

Call DHS Immediately! Nasruddin 17 hrs ago #29

pedo and his henchmen should move to Tx or Fl and let the rest of us get our country back Marthe48 7 hrs ago #40