Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Looking to limit birthright citizenship, Trump turns to an 1884 Supreme Court ruling against a Native American man [View all]Fiendish Thingy
(23,200 posts)15. All the more reason why we must only elect Dem senators willing to kill the filibuster and expand the court
BTW, Roe was an implied right, not black letter law like birthright citizenship- something that could be solved by 1) codifying reproductive rights in law, and 2) expanding the court to a majority who will uphold it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Looking to limit birthright citizenship, Trump turns to an 1884 Supreme Court ruling against a Native American man [View all]
BumRushDaShow
23 hrs ago
OP
Wow, had not seen your response but mine was exactly the same..."With this court?"
Escurumbele
9 hrs ago
#32
"if birthright citizenship is revoked, can the reinstitution of slavery still be off limits?"
BumRushDaShow
20 hrs ago
#13
All the more reason why we must only elect Dem senators willing to kill the filibuster and expand the court
Fiendish Thingy
20 hrs ago
#15
Roe was focused on enforcement of the PRIVATE right for women to choose what to do with her own body
BumRushDaShow
11 hrs ago
#30
That's because Biden wanted to wait on the report from the bipartisan commission on court reform
Fiendish Thingy
4 hrs ago
#42
"If the constitution says two term limit for a president, it doesn't mean three"
BumRushDaShow
7 hrs ago
#33
If thats the story then it would seem to have zero meaning to today's case.
Callie1979
10 hrs ago
#31
This case in an interpretation that is consistent with how the provision has always been interpreted.
Ms. Toad
18 hrs ago
#21
pedo and his henchmen should move to Tx or Fl and let the rest of us get our country back
Marthe48
4 hrs ago
#40