Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Looking to limit birthright citizenship, Trump turns to an 1884 Supreme Court ruling against a Native American man [View all]Bayard
(29,655 posts)26. I'm not buying that argument
"Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution states that "Congress shall have the power to regulate Commerce with foreign nations and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes",[8] determining that Indian tribes were separate from the federal government, the states, and foreign nations."
The various tribes are sovereign nations within the U.S., but the government is required to protect them.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Looking to limit birthright citizenship, Trump turns to an 1884 Supreme Court ruling against a Native American man [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Yesterday
OP
Wow, had not seen your response but mine was exactly the same..."With this court?"
Escurumbele
10 hrs ago
#32
"if birthright citizenship is revoked, can the reinstitution of slavery still be off limits?"
BumRushDaShow
21 hrs ago
#13
All the more reason why we must only elect Dem senators willing to kill the filibuster and expand the court
Fiendish Thingy
21 hrs ago
#15
Roe was focused on enforcement of the PRIVATE right for women to choose what to do with her own body
BumRushDaShow
12 hrs ago
#30
That's because Biden wanted to wait on the report from the bipartisan commission on court reform
Fiendish Thingy
5 hrs ago
#42
"If the constitution says two term limit for a president, it doesn't mean three"
BumRushDaShow
9 hrs ago
#33
If thats the story then it would seem to have zero meaning to today's case.
Callie1979
11 hrs ago
#31
This case in an interpretation that is consistent with how the provision has always been interpreted.
Ms. Toad
20 hrs ago
#21
pedo and his henchmen should move to Tx or Fl and let the rest of us get our country back
Marthe48
6 hrs ago
#40