Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

QueerDuck

(1,696 posts)
31. One can oppose a war hawk without using bigoted language...
Tue Mar 31, 2026, 06:55 AM
2 hrs ago

Using someone’s identity as a punchline doesn't make anyone a better "warrior for peace." Instead, when anyone does that, it just sends the message to every trans or gender-nonconforming person in this community that support for them is conditional. Using misgendering or identity-based slurs as a weapon only serves to reinforce the idea that a person’s identity is only valid as long as we like them.

This isn't about being 'nice' to one politician... it’s about the collateral damage. When we use bigoted tropes to attack our enemies, we’re still validating the bigotry itself... and that hurts the vulnerable people on our own side far more than it hurts LG.

We don’t oppose misgendering simply because the target deserves respect --- we oppose it because we have standards. If our commitment to trans rights or gender identity is conditional (if it's based on whether or not we actually like the person) then it’s not a deeply held principle. That's when it becomes a performative hobby.

I think it's important for me to re-state the obvious: It's possible to loathe his politics and loathe his ethics, or to just hate him personally... but WITHOUT resorting to the same kind of identity-based attacks we fight against every day. After all, we manage to loathe Clarence Thomas without using racially-charged words like "uppity" and "boy"... so it shouldn't be too difficult to also oppose a war hawk without misgendering him, or insulting him with "lady" or "miss" or "diva."

I’m genuinely disappointed that basic consistency on human rights is even a point of contention here. I’ve said my piece, and I’m not interested in a back-and-forth over whether bigotry is useful, or whether the target "deserves" it.

I’m not going to argue the "merits" or the "exceptions allowed" when it comes to using identity-based slurs. Either we have principles or we don't. I'll leave it at that and won't be responding further.

Bye. Have a nice day.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Newsom is developing a pattern TommyT139 Yesterday #1
How is calling Graham a "diva" homophobic? Irish_Dem Yesterday #2
Say what you want, of course. TommyT139 Yesterday #5
It's a term meant for a woman, not a man Polybius 11 hrs ago #25
I have never encountered "diva" as a gay slur Miguelito Loveless Yesterday #9
There you go! "Goddess" ... it's mis-gendering him and using it to denigrate him. QueerDuck Yesterday #12
You went straight to the original meaning from the Italian Miguelito Loveless 23 hrs ago #14
When such great care is taken to split hairs to justify misgendering ... QueerDuck 22 hrs ago #16
IIRC - Mohammed Ali used the term "niggardly" on the Dick Cavett Show just to bring up a point. rubbersole 22 hrs ago #18
Do you want everyone to be nice to Lindsay Graham. He has been the greatest advocate of this war. Let's not offend him Doodley 10 hrs ago #28
One can oppose a war hawk without using bigoted language... QueerDuck 2 hrs ago #31
Maybe he should have just posted a sternly worded message?!?! Bengus81 Yesterday #11
Sorry. I'm not buying the microaggession argument johnnyplankton 22 hrs ago #17
isn't there a rule around about sit flinging? SalamanderSleeps 11 hrs ago #26
Newsom is attacking a war mongering, Trump stooge. You seem to be attacking Newsom. Doodley 10 hrs ago #27
Good for Governor Newsom, Graham is a bit of a Diva as far as I can tell. wcmagumba Yesterday #3
Collecting his payoff. twodogsbarking Yesterday #4
"Why is an old man with no kids going to Disney?" Ray Bruns Yesterday #6
searching poozwah Yesterday #7
There are many people who go to Disney World without kids LetMyPeopleVote 23 hrs ago #13
There's some context others see here that you may be missing SpankMe 22 hrs ago #15
There are many persons without children who enjoy Disney. LetMyPeopleVote 20 hrs ago #22
With respect, it's not my own characterization SpankMe 12 hrs ago #24
The difference is Graham is a creep. Would you trust him with your kids? Doodley 10 hrs ago #29
Graham's excuse sounds about as believeable as the one given by Cancun Cruz a few years back rpannier Yesterday #8
I would like to see him grilled, like a hamberder, well done. twodogsbarking Yesterday #10
Disney Ad Campaign Parody 2na fisherman 21 hrs ago #19
He's eating at a restaurant called Chef Mickey's chernabogg 21 hrs ago #20
He is a disgrace to mankind. Just like his hero. nt City Lights 20 hrs ago #21
WTF! Buddyzbuddy 19 hrs ago #23
When you're telling your constituents to send their sons & daughters to fight in Iran dflprincess 10 hrs ago #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Lindsey Graham takes gril...»Reply #31