Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(179,874 posts)
36. MaddowBlog-Trump's elections power-grab on mail-in voting is likely to fail, but it's not irrelevant
Wed Apr 1, 2026, 04:13 PM
17 hrs ago

It might be tempting to brush off the president’s executive order as pointless political theater. But it’s not quite that simple.

It might be tempting to brush off Trump’s latest elections power-grab as pointless political theater since the executive order will fail in the courts.

But when a president becomes the nation’s most serious threat to the integrity of the electoral process, it matters.
www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...

Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2026-04-01T12:58:44.338Z

https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trumps-elections-power-grab-is-likely-to-fail-but-that-doesnt-mean-its-irrelevant

As March came to an end, the Republican again ignored his own country’s policymaking process, again decided to circumvent Congress and again signed an executive order giving himself sweeping authority over the country’s elections systems. MS NOW reported:

Trump’s order requires the Department of Homeland Security … to create a list of U.S. citizens who are eligible to vote. DHS would be expected to rely on information provided by the Social Security Administration, according to the Daily Caller, which first reported the Trump administration’s plans.

The U.S. Postal Service would then use that database to send absentee ballots to voters identified as eligible for mail-in voting, according to a White House fact sheet. The ballots would be mailed in envelopes with special codes only to voters enrolled in state-specific absentee ballot programs.


.....If Trump’s policy is ridiculous, and its failure in the courts appears inevitable, it might be tempting to brush off his latest gambit as pointless political theater.

But it’s not quite that simple. For one thing, the latest power-grab is part of a comprehensive effort to undermine public confidence in the nation’s electoral system and sow doubts about election results that Republicans don’t like. The president has played an instrumental role in fueling unnecessary public skepticism, and his executive order is likely to make a bad situation worse.

For another, Trump continues to position himself as the nation’s single most serious threat to the integrity of the electoral process.

On Tuesday morning, The New York Times published an op-ed by Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, who made a convincing case that the most pressing danger to our elections isn’t coming from abroad; it’s coming from the White House.

“For months, President Trump has made his intentions clear,” the senator wrote. “He has called for the federal government to ‘take over’ elections, impose national rules and override state authority. Now we are beginning to see how he may plan to do this.”

Later that same day, the president helped prove Warner right.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This order is a joke and will be struck down LetMyPeopleVote Tuesday #1
It is time to. #LockUpTrump Trueblue1968 Tuesday #8
So what? Trump doesn't care. Irish_Dem Tuesday #27
We need to make it so future admins can't allow shady think tanks like the Heritage Foundation to abuse EO privileges. Initech Tuesday #2
fool proof ? dweller Tuesday #3
If done, the minute there is the slightest discrepancy Captain Zero Tuesday #5
Maybe it is a setup,ike his multiple challenge cases in 2020 wnylib Tuesday #23
Corollary to Murphy's Law. TomSlick Tuesday #11
Elections are run by the states. MLWR Tuesday #4
Democracy Docket-Trump signs sweeping order attacking mail-in voting LetMyPeopleVote Tuesday #6
"Becker said he expects courts to move quickly to block the order" BumRushDaShow Tuesday #9
Im pretty sure thats where it will get filed...have a hard time Volaris Tuesday #17
It's expected to be filed in multiple district courts BumRushDaShow Yesterday #35
The courts have a choice orangecrush Tuesday #29
Hey Trump, I gotcha executive order right here oasis Tuesday #7
Putin & Orban? popsdenver Tuesday #10
There's a wee bit o' difference in how elections are run and votes counted in Russia and Hungary compared to the US Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #13
Trump knows the SAVE act will never pass Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #12
Without a doubt. Just a reminder, Bluetus Tuesday #21
He thinks he can rule by decree. DavidDvorkin Tuesday #14
Our wonderful Oregon AG Dan Rayfield has already filed a lawsuit. And our SOS is working on one. Amaryllis Tuesday #15
"compile and transmit to the chief election official of each State a list . . . ' AverageOldGuy Tuesday #16
Exactly! reACTIONary Tuesday #31
Next up: voter registration data breach, BadgerKid Tuesday #18
Laying more groundwork to tie up courts, cause confusion, and perhaps most importanlty Bristlecone Tuesday #19
Very worrying. 🤬 ffr Tuesday #20
"efforts to reshape American elections" hibbing Tuesday #22
This is where the cultists get confused Dyedinthewoolliberal Tuesday #24
It will be blocked within days pfitz59 Tuesday #25
That's why he's suing states for their voter rolls.I expect multiple lawsuits. FloridaBlues Tuesday #26
Here we go. orangecrush Tuesday #28
Kings don't need voter rolls, nor do they waste time on elections FakeNoose Tuesday #30
Can't help wondering I'd be on the approved list. Bobstandard Tuesday #32
He's shitting himself something fierce Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Tuesday #33
So people never move or change names? mackdaddy Tuesday #34
MaddowBlog-Trump's elections power-grab on mail-in voting is likely to fail, but it's not irrelevant LetMyPeopleVote 17 hrs ago #36
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump signs a new executi...»Reply #36