Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Trump signs a new executive order on voting. Experts say he lacks the authority [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(179,874 posts)36. MaddowBlog-Trump's elections power-grab on mail-in voting is likely to fail, but it's not irrelevant
It might be tempting to brush off the presidents executive order as pointless political theater. But its not quite that simple.
It might be tempting to brush off Trumpâs latest elections power-grab as pointless political theater since the executive order will fail in the courts.
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2026-04-01T12:58:44.338Z
But when a president becomes the nationâs most serious threat to the integrity of the electoral process, it matters.
www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trumps-elections-power-grab-is-likely-to-fail-but-that-doesnt-mean-its-irrelevant
As March came to an end, the Republican again ignored his own countrys policymaking process, again decided to circumvent Congress and again signed an executive order giving himself sweeping authority over the countrys elections systems. MS NOW reported:
.....If Trumps policy is ridiculous, and its failure in the courts appears inevitable, it might be tempting to brush off his latest gambit as pointless political theater.
But its not quite that simple. For one thing, the latest power-grab is part of a comprehensive effort to undermine public confidence in the nations electoral system and sow doubts about election results that Republicans dont like. The president has played an instrumental role in fueling unnecessary public skepticism, and his executive order is likely to make a bad situation worse.
For another, Trump continues to position himself as the nations single most serious threat to the integrity of the electoral process.
On Tuesday morning, The New York Times published an op-ed by Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, who made a convincing case that the most pressing danger to our elections isnt coming from abroad; its coming from the White House.
For months, President Trump has made his intentions clear, the senator wrote. He has called for the federal government to take over elections, impose national rules and override state authority. Now we are beginning to see how he may plan to do this.
Later that same day, the president helped prove Warner right.
Trumps order requires the Department of Homeland Security to create a list of U.S. citizens who are eligible to vote. DHS would be expected to rely on information provided by the Social Security Administration, according to the Daily Caller, which first reported the Trump administrations plans.
The U.S. Postal Service would then use that database to send absentee ballots to voters identified as eligible for mail-in voting, according to a White House fact sheet. The ballots would be mailed in envelopes with special codes only to voters enrolled in state-specific absentee ballot programs.
.....If Trumps policy is ridiculous, and its failure in the courts appears inevitable, it might be tempting to brush off his latest gambit as pointless political theater.
But its not quite that simple. For one thing, the latest power-grab is part of a comprehensive effort to undermine public confidence in the nations electoral system and sow doubts about election results that Republicans dont like. The president has played an instrumental role in fueling unnecessary public skepticism, and his executive order is likely to make a bad situation worse.
For another, Trump continues to position himself as the nations single most serious threat to the integrity of the electoral process.
On Tuesday morning, The New York Times published an op-ed by Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, who made a convincing case that the most pressing danger to our elections isnt coming from abroad; its coming from the White House.
For months, President Trump has made his intentions clear, the senator wrote. He has called for the federal government to take over elections, impose national rules and override state authority. Now we are beginning to see how he may plan to do this.
Later that same day, the president helped prove Warner right.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Trump signs a new executive order on voting. Experts say he lacks the authority [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Tuesday
OP
We need to make it so future admins can't allow shady think tanks like the Heritage Foundation to abuse EO privileges.
Initech
Tuesday
#2
There's a wee bit o' difference in how elections are run and votes counted in Russia and Hungary compared to the US
Fiendish Thingy
Tuesday
#13
Our wonderful Oregon AG Dan Rayfield has already filed a lawsuit. And our SOS is working on one.
Amaryllis
Tuesday
#15
"compile and transmit to the chief election official of each State a list . . . '
AverageOldGuy
Tuesday
#16
Laying more groundwork to tie up courts, cause confusion, and perhaps most importanlty
Bristlecone
Tuesday
#19
That's why he's suing states for their voter rolls.I expect multiple lawsuits.
FloridaBlues
Tuesday
#26
MaddowBlog-Trump's elections power-grab on mail-in voting is likely to fail, but it's not irrelevant
LetMyPeopleVote
17 hrs ago
#36