Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

AZ8theist

(7,577 posts)

7. Wait, WHAT??!? I thought the supremes ruled Trump was KING.

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Apr 21, 2026, 06:43 PM

Apr 21

"And therefore, shall no peasant infringe upon His Majesty's Imbecility and Most Righteous Criminality" *

* (not 100% sure, but I heard that was in the SC ruling on Preznit immunity....probably Alitos concuring opinion)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump has a deadline to explain why 'discovery should not proceed against him' in Jan. 6 lawsuits now that judge ruled [View all] BumRushDaShow Apr 21 OP

Interesting dweller Apr 21 #1

I think this case is related to the Capitol Police civil lawsuits BumRushDaShow Apr 21 #3

I meant in regard to dweller Apr 21 #4

That Brennan thing is another "Pirro Special" BumRushDaShow Apr 21 #5

Don't know where his particular case stands but I wonder how Swalwell's Marie Marie Apr 21 #2

I was thinking that too Bayard Apr 21 #8

Let the discovering begin! It's time FakeNoose Apr 21 #6

Wait, WHAT??!? I thought the supremes ruled Trump was KING. AZ8theist Apr 21 #7