Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Virginia judge blocks redistricting referendum from being certified [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(181,598 posts)7. Virginia court blocks voter-approved redistricting, appeal coming
There will be an appeal
WTF? THE PEOPLE IF VA VOTED ð¤¬ð¤¬ð¤¬
— (Debbie)ðððð¼âï¸ð¶âï¸ð (@felicianmitzi.bsky.social) 2026-04-22T21:22:43.850Z
Virginia court blocks voter-approved redistricting, appeal coming - Democracy Docket share.google/bTbShobuTknZ...
https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/virginia-court-blocks-voter-approved-redistricting-appeal-coming/
A Virginia judge temporarily halted the states newly approved congressional map but state officials are already moving to try to overturn the ruling, setting up a rapid legal fight in the states Supreme Court.
In a decision issued Wednesday on a Republican lawsuit, a judge in Tazewell County ruled that the legislatures constitutional amendment and the referendum voters just approved were invalid a move that immediately blocks the state from implementing the new districts.
The court declared the amendment invalid from the start, and ordered that any and all votes for or against the proposed constitutional amendment in the April 21, 2026 special election are ineffective.
The judge also went further, issuing a permanent injunction a legal order that blocks action going forward preventing state officials from certifying the results and from taking any actions to give effect to the proposed constitutional amendment.
But despite the sweeping language, this ruling is far from the final word.
Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones (D) moved immediately to challenge the decision, signaling a fast-track appeal that could quickly shift the case to higher courts.
In a decision issued Wednesday on a Republican lawsuit, a judge in Tazewell County ruled that the legislatures constitutional amendment and the referendum voters just approved were invalid a move that immediately blocks the state from implementing the new districts.
The court declared the amendment invalid from the start, and ordered that any and all votes for or against the proposed constitutional amendment in the April 21, 2026 special election are ineffective.
The judge also went further, issuing a permanent injunction a legal order that blocks action going forward preventing state officials from certifying the results and from taking any actions to give effect to the proposed constitutional amendment.
But despite the sweeping language, this ruling is far from the final word.
Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones (D) moved immediately to challenge the decision, signaling a fast-track appeal that could quickly shift the case to higher courts.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
7 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why would this go as far as it did without legal scrutiny to make sure it's constitutional? They'll tie this up
Deuxcents
Apr 22
#4
That's the same judge who tried blocking it TWICE before and got swatted down BOTH TIMES by the VA SC.
BumRushDaShow
Apr 22
#9
Little fish in a big pond and will realize he's at the bottom of the food chain.
BumRushDaShow
Apr 22
#13
So this motherfucker represents Mervis P. Dirtwater and his in-bred hillbilly clan?
Aristus
Apr 22
#23
Well, I didn't say that. I would never impugn Appalachians who are clearly God's own people.
maxsolomon
Apr 22
#25
Oh, please...and we're supposed to believe it wasn't unconstitutional when Texas started this shit by FORCING their
Karasu
Apr 22
#16
Although I disagree with the judge's decision, "the people voted" bears no relevance to what judges look at
Polybius
Apr 22
#24