Latest Breaking News

riversedge

(81,426 posts) Mon Apr 27, 2026, 11:30 AM Apr 27

Katie Phang Sues DOJ Over Alleged Violations of Epstein Files Transparency Law [View all]

Source: meidasnews.com

A major test will be standing.

Aaron Parnas 45 minutes ago

Journalist and legal analyst Katie Phang has filed a federal lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice, accusing it of failing to comply with a landmark transparency law requiring the release of records related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his network.

The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, names Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche as the defendant and alleges “brazen” violations of the 2025 Epstein Files Transparency Act, a statute intended to force the public release of government-held materials tied to Epstein and his associates.

..............

Phang’s complaint alleges a pattern of misconduct by the DOJ, including:

Missing statutory deadlines for document production
Improper or excessive redactions
Failure to explain redactions as required by law
Withholding or retracting key documents after release

Read more: https://meidasnews.com/news/katie-phang-sues-doj-over-alleged-violations-of-epstein-files-transparency-law

It is PAST time someone did this.

The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, names Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche as the defendant and alleges “brazen” violations of the 2025 Epstein Files Transparency Act,

https://meidasnews.com/news/katie-phang-sues-doj-over-alleged-violations-of-epstein-files-transparency-law

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Katie Phang Sues DOJ Over Alleged Violations of Epstein Files Transparency Law [View all] riversedge Apr 27 OP

What is the punishment if they still refuse to release all files? Fla Dem Apr 27 #1

But she is Whip-poor-will Apr 27 #4

You think there are literal rape tapes, and Biden's DoJ just sat on them and didn't pursue anyone appearing in them? AZJonnie Apr 27 #6

The victims have said, repeatedly that their names were published while questionseverything Apr 27 #7

Can you show me an instance of one of them saying the name of a rich man who raped them personally was redacted? AZJonnie Apr 27 #9

Team Bondi & Blanch seem to have been instrumental in this particular protection racket Attilatheblond Apr 27 #18

President Biden was not involved in the day-to-day decisions of then AG Garland. Justice matters. Apr 27 #8

And I don't think AG Garland would've just sat on videos that proved a child was raped AZJonnie Apr 27 #10

Not sure of that. Garland waited two years before seriously looking at the insurrectionist-in-chief's Justice matters. Apr 27 #13

That's not what I recall re: when Trump's role in Jan 6. began to be looked at by Garland's DoJ AZJonnie Apr 27 #16

We all saw the felon's speech and INCITEMENT live or on streaming... Justice matters. Apr 27 #21

Video of the Jan 6th public speech would never have been enough to make federal charges stick AZJonnie Apr 27 #23

There's a lot of years between Epstein's first Florida conviction questionseverything Apr 27 #20

If I'm not mistaken, there was a long investigation ongoing Justice matters. Apr 27 #22

But how EuterpeThelo Apr 27 #2

Rape tapes are coming Whip-poor-will Apr 27 #3

They would be very seriously breaking the law if they did this AZJonnie Apr 27 #12

That's right Whip-poor-will Apr 27 #14

S/he stole copies of illegal child-porn videos from FBI evidence? AZJonnie Apr 27 #15

Bravo Katie! DemocracyForever Apr 27 #5

I am saddened to say......... popsdenver Apr 27 #11

Sometimes you just have to do the right thing....win or lose. democrank Apr 27 #17

👍 Figarosmom Apr 27 #19

Good for her Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 28 #24