But in any case, an actual video is the gold standard of evidence. If a video of Trump literally directing the insurrection had been available, I don't think Garland's DoJ would've dragged their feet.
Maybe my faith is misplaced, but I just don't think Garland's FBI had videos of old rich guys raping the minors in Epstein's orbit, or Garland's DoJ would have pursued those men criminally. Nobody from the FBI has ever confirmed such videos exist (though they've said Epstein had child porn generally, they never said he was in them, or the girls he knew were in them). I'd think someone (perhaps who was fired by Bondi) would've come out by now and said "yeah, they do exist, I've unfortunately seen them myself" or that sort of thing.
To be clear, the lack of videos doesn't prove such offenses didn't happen, it just means there's not a super-easy way to prosecute people over the crimes. Bottom-line I don't think there's enough evidence (i.e. what we currently know), to presuppose that there ARE such videos. At best I think it's a maybe. MHO, fwiw 
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
= new reply since forum marked as read