Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

bluevoter4life

(806 posts)

6. So if i'm reading this correctly

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Sun May 3, 2026, 02:43 AM

Sunday

Everything else aside, he would have been fine if he just had an anti-Biden (former occupant) sign out front, but because it also included a pro-Trump (current occupant) sign, it was a violation? Seems like a reasonable restriction actually.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Veteran loses First Amendment lawsuit after retirement home bars him from displaying pro-Trump and anti-Biden messages [View all] BumRushDaShow Saturday OP

It took 33 pages to say that's it's private property? underpants Saturday #1

It's not "private property." It says so quite clearly in the first pages of the opinion. onenote Saturday #3

I think lower court decisions are getting longer to bolster rationales against decimation by SCOTUS. pat_k Saturday #4

Post removed Post removed Saturday #2

Good... Sorry Vet.. you're for the Nazi Cha Saturday #5

So if i'm reading this correctly bluevoter4life Sunday #6