AI fails to make inroads with cybercriminals, study finds

[jfz9580m]

1. I suspect it is that criminals actually want to make money

And ai is useless and mainly for bubble pushing swindlers.
The CS people have been attacking medical research (where scams are far easier to detect; e.g.: Elizabeth Holmes vs Tech Bros, though even in her case she went over in scamming the investor class which is where these guys are headed, hence the desperation to take over society) as needing stringent oversight with asinine people like Ioannidis parroting it from Stanford, which totally had no motivations except the purest of course.
Maybe it is time to apply actual scientific standards to ai and cs in general.

A nuisance field with dreary and unwanted products, toys and services outside of cybersecurity and some essential stuff we pay for as opposed to all the stuff we don’t pay for since we don’t want it. Outside of Woebot, Lybrate etc that is rare in medicine.

And their use of metaphors is brain destroying.

That Diplomacy Game with human oversight vaguely seemsminimally annoying in dealings and communications with those guys.

Tired of my wallet being attacked day after day. My govt (the real one not a metaphor) has seriously pissed me off.