Appellate judges seem skeptical of Trump administration's appointments of some top prosecutors

[BumRushDaShow]

2. They haven't ruled yet

but the media is sitting in the courtroom as the arguments are being made and the judges are questioning each set of lawyers. So the reporters are giving "hot takes" on the types of questions and tone of the judges when hearing the responses.

Characterizing that as "seem skeptical" suggests there is a stronger likelihood of ruling against the government.

But if they characterized it as "seem supportive of" or "seem sympathetic to" would suggest they would allow the illegal extensions of the appointees.

All of this has to do with the fringe 'Unitary Executive" theory that basically negates the need for a legislative branch, creating a dictator.