Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

underpants

(197,044 posts)
4. The Cato Institute says the same. Double whammy.
Thu May 7, 2026, 08:14 PM
Thursday
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=3661978


APRIL 14, 2026 1:57PM
Section 122 Is an Anachronism, Not a License for New Tariffs

The administration’s latest tariff move does not just rest on bad policy. It rests on a concept that no longer fits the world we live in. That is why I joined the economists’ amicus brief challenging the administration’s use of Section 122 in the US Court of International Trade, which can be found here. The core problem is simple: Section 122 was written for a monetary order that has passed. The administration is trying to revive it as if nothing important has changed in the international monetary system since the early 1970s.

https://www.cato.org/blog/section-122-anachronism-not-license-new-tariffs

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

You beat me LetMyPeopleVote Thursday #1
LOL BumRushDaShow Thursday #3
Why Trump's Section 122 Tariffs Are Illegal LetMyPeopleVote Thursday #2
The Cato Institute says the same. Double whammy. underpants Thursday #4
Ketchup! That must've been a pool of small businesses underpants Thursday #5
The ketchup alert status has been raised to KETCHCON 1! LetMyPeopleVote Thursday #6
😂😂😂 underpants Yesterday #8
And of today a treat to raise tariffs. republianmushroom Thursday #7
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US trade court rules agai...»Reply #4