Impeachment sought against federal judge over alleged sex in chambers, lying to investigators

[manicdem]

10. The judge admitted to it

https://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/judicial_complaints/11-25-90212%20Judicial%20Council%20Order_0.pdf

On October 10, 2025, the Subject Judge, through an attorney, submitted to Chief Judge
Pryor a supplemental response.26 In that supplemental response, the Subject Judge: (1) admitted
to having had an extramarital affair with the Officer; (2) admitted that, in the course of the affair,
the judge had sexual intercourse in the judge’s office; and (3) maintained the judge’s denials of
the other allegations.