Latest Breaking News

OldBaldy1701E

(11,815 posts)

7. So, all that for stock options?

Wed Jun 17, 2026, 07:41 AM

Jun 17

They make a world-wide disruption and then end up on their asses and having to pay Iran just to try and patch up what they ruined for everyone.

Why any other country would want to even be 'diplomatic' with this joke of a nation anymore is a surprise to me. It is obvious that we are becoming a real threat to the entire planet.

And, we don't seem too worried about what this nation had wrought. That is just as surprising.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

raging moderate Hey Joe mahina

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US officials downplay text of the Iran agreement, saying it doesn't account for back-channel commitments [View all] BumRushDaShow Jun 17 OP

Pay-offs for the fat orange imbecile wolfie001 Jun 17 #1

I'm pretty sure a few countries in the Middle East are very uneasy................ Lovie777 Jun 17 #2

I mean, they're on the hook for $300 billion and have a full-fledged economic competitor Prairie Gates Jun 17 #12

"The framework is aimed at providing Iran the ability to sell it politically to their internal audience." Really? sop Jun 17 #3

More like Trump is trying to sell it to his internal audience. Baitball Blogger Jun 17 #5

Projection. They're trying to spin it for people here. ananda Jun 17 #9

Whipping our butts will not be hard to sell to the Iranian public. mahina Jun 17 #40

Back channel commitments. Baitball Blogger Jun 17 #4

.... yardwork Jun 17 #6

So, all that for stock options? OldBaldy1701E Jun 17 #7

" aimed at providing Iran the ability to sell it politically" Strelnikov_ Jun 17 #8

It's giving secret girlfriend in NIagara Falls Prairie Gates Jun 17 #10

In my honest opinion, Mtnmama Jun 17 #11

I.O.W.s The agreement gives Iran everything it wanted and 300 billion in reparations for Trump's war ... Botany Jun 17 #13

It is not "reparations". It is a "private investment fund". AloeVera Jun 17 #20

I might be wrong but @ the end of day the U.S. taxpayers will be on the hook for paying for Trump's war. Botany Jun 17 #21

Of course they are. One of the many, many reasons to not rush into an unnecessary, trumped-up war of choice. AloeVera Jun 17 #25

Another worthless document from the dumpie administration. KS Toronado Jun 17 #14

Back channel commitments?All that matters is what is actually signed,and with Trump,half the time even that won't matter thesquanderer Jun 17 #15

Everything Trump for 10+ years has gotten us to this point where NoMoreRepugs Jun 17 #16

Backchannel commitments for what? The rebuilding business deals that Trump wants the bribe money to be spent on? ChicagoTeamster Jun 17 #17

Maybe they're trying to figure out ways to WestMichRad Jun 17 #26

Which is why they wanted to delay releasing the text until at least Friday.. SamuelAdams Jun 17 #18

It was a birthday party favor for the man-child... Hugin Jun 17 #19

Ah, Yessss; The Old "Back-Channel Commitments" Trick..... ColoringFool Jun 17 #22

A "political document" only existing as a birthday present for the loser in the white house. travelingthrulife Jun 17 #23

$300,000,000,000 is still $300,000,000,000. paulkienitz Jun 17 #24

Per "back-channel agreements" it is probably 500 billion (classified for purposes of National Security) pat_k Jun 17 #32

Trump and his war-mongering assholes are desperate agingdem Jun 17 #27

I'm surprised they're not communicating in "pig latin". Buddyzbuddy Jun 17 #28

Maybe Dotard tore up the original agreement because he didn't know about its maxsolomon Jun 17 #29

TACO !! republianmushroom Jun 17 #30

Of course, any back-channel agreements are WORSE. pat_k Jun 17 #31

Ooh backchannel commitments Johnny2X2X Jun 17 #33

They're just words. Nothing to see here. Scalded Nun Jun 17 #34

Translation: the memorandum isn't worth the paper it's printed on. patphil Jun 17 #35

Give me a break. City Lights Jun 17 #36

LOL! Did Dean Wormer put Iran on double-secret probation? Mysterian Jun 17 #37

Is a back channel agreement , one that goes straight up my ass? 3Hotdogs Jun 17 #38

There is an essential rule of law. TomSlick Jun 17 #39